[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy words-to-avoid.html
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
www/philosophy words-to-avoid.html |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:17:32 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Richard M. Stallman <rms> 14/11/14 00:17:32
Modified files:
philosophy : words-to-avoid.html
Log message:
Suggest alternatives for "content". Minor clarifications.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.191&r2=1.192
Patches:
Index: words-to-avoid.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html,v
retrieving revision 1.191
retrieving revision 1.192
diff -u -b -r1.191 -r1.192
--- words-to-avoid.html 4 Aug 2014 22:08:13 -0000 1.191
+++ words-to-avoid.html 14 Nov 2014 00:17:32 -0000 1.192
@@ -331,17 +331,20 @@
noun to describe written and other works of authorship adopts an
attitude you might rather avoid. It regards these works as a
commodity whose purpose is to fill a box and make money. In effect,
-it disparages the works themselves.</p>
+it disparages the works themselves. If you don't agree with that
+attitude, you can call them “works” or “publications.”
+</p>
<p>
-Those who use this term are often the publishers that push for
-increased copyright power in the name of the authors
+Those who use the term “content” are often the publishers
+that push for increased copyright power in the name of the authors
(“creators,” as they say) of the works. The term
-“content” reveals their real attitude towards these works and
their authors.
+“content” reveals their real attitude towards these works
+and their authors.
(See <a
href="http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/print.html">Courtney
Love's open letter to Steve Case</a> and search for “content
provider” in that page. Alas, Ms. Love is unaware that the term
-“intellectual property” is also <a href="#IntellectualProperty">
-biased and confusing</a>.)</p>
+“intellectual property” is
+also <a href="#IntellectualProperty"> biased and confusing</a>.)</p>
<p>
However, as long as other people use the term “content
provider,” political dissidents can well call themselves
@@ -976,7 +979,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/08/04 22:08:13 $
+$Date: 2014/11/14 00:17:32 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
- www/philosophy words-to-avoid.html,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- www/philosophy words-to-avoid.html, Richard M. Stallman, 2014/11/16
- www/philosophy words-to-avoid.html, Richard M. Stallman, 2014/11/16
- www/philosophy words-to-avoid.html, Pavel Kharitonov, 2014/11/16
- www/philosophy words-to-avoid.html, Jo?rg Kohn?, 2014/11/24
- www/philosophy words-to-avoid.html, Richard M. Stallman, 2014/11/30