[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/sco/po sco-v-ibm.fr.po sco-v-ibm...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy/sco/po sco-v-ibm.fr.po sco-v-ibm... |
|
Date: |
Wed, 01 Jan 2014 13:35:04 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 14/01/01 13:35:04
Modified files:
philosophy/sco/po: sco-v-ibm.fr.po sco-v-ibm.it.po sco-v-ibm.pot
sco-v-ibm.ru.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.27&r2=1.28
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.10&r2=1.11
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
Patches:
Index: sco-v-ibm.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.27
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -b -r1.27 -r1.28
--- sco-v-ibm.fr.po 31 Aug 2013 16:46:57 -0000 1.27
+++ sco-v-ibm.fr.po 1 Jan 2014 13:35:03 -0000 1.28
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: sco-v-ibm.fr.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-26 08:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-01 13:32+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-08-30 11:18+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-01 13:32+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -132,6 +133,62 @@
"seul à remplir."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has
+# | SCO alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of
+# | which SCO is by intermediate transactions the successor in
+# | interest—have been incorporated by IBM in the kernel, Linux, or in
+# | parts of GNU? If the former, there is no justification for the broad
+# | statements urging the Fortune 1500 to be cautious about using free
+# | software, or GNU programs generally. If, on the other hand, SCO claims
+# | that GNU contains any Unix trade secret or copyrighted material, the claim
+# | is almost surely false. Contributors to the GNU Project promise to follow
+# | the Free Software Foundation's rules for the project, which
+# | specify—among other things—that contributors must not enter
+# | into non-disclosure agreements for technical information relevant to their
+# | work on GNU programs, and that they must not consult or make any use of
+# | source code from non-free programs, including specifically Unix. The
+# | Foundation has no basis to believe that GNU contains any material about
+# | which SCO or anyone else could assert valid trade secret or copyright
+# | claims. Contributors could have made misrepresentations of fact in their
+# | copyright assignment statements, but failing willful misrepresentation by
+# | a contributor, which has never happened so far as the Foundation is aware,
+# | there is no significant likelihood that our supervision of the freedom of
+# | our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that despite the
+# | alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation has not been
+# | sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work whose
+# | copyright the Foundation [-holds-including-] {+holds—including+} all
+# | of IBM's modifications to the kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe
+# | computers, assigned to the Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts
+# | infringes its rights in any way.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has "
+#| "SCO alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of "
+#| "which SCO is by intermediate transactions the successor in interest—"
+#| "have been incorporated by IBM in the kernel, Linux, or in parts of GNU? "
+#| "If the former, there is no justification for the broad statements urging "
+#| "the Fortune 1500 to be cautious about using free software, or GNU "
+#| "programs generally. If, on the other hand, SCO claims that GNU contains "
+#| "any Unix trade secret or copyrighted material, the claim is almost surely "
+#| "false. Contributors to the GNU Project promise to follow the Free "
+#| "Software Foundation's rules for the project, which specify—among "
+#| "other things—that contributors must not enter into non-disclosure "
+#| "agreements for technical information relevant to their work on GNU "
+#| "programs, and that they must not consult or make any use of source code "
+#| "from non-free programs, including specifically Unix. The Foundation has "
+#| "no basis to believe that GNU contains any material about which SCO or "
+#| "anyone else could assert valid trade secret or copyright claims. "
+#| "Contributors could have made misrepresentations of fact in their "
+#| "copyright assignment statements, but failing willful misrepresentation by "
+#| "a contributor, which has never happened so far as the Foundation is "
+#| "aware, there is no significant likelihood that our supervision of the "
+#| "freedom of our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that "
+#| "despite the alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation "
+#| "has not been sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work "
+#| "whose copyright the Foundation holds-including all of IBM's modifications "
+#| "to the kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to "
+#| "the Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any "
+#| "way."
msgid ""
"SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has SCO "
"alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of which SCO "
@@ -155,9 +212,9 @@
"our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that despite the "
"alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation has not been "
"sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work whose copyright "
-"the Foundation holds-including all of IBM's modifications to the kernel for "
-"use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to the Foundation by "
-"IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any way."
+"the Foundation holds—including all of IBM's modifications to the "
+"kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to the "
+"Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any way."
msgstr ""
"L'utilisation déroutante de ces noms rend confus le fondement de la "
"revendication de SCO : prétend-elle que des éléments provenant d'AT&T
"
Index: sco-v-ibm.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- sco-v-ibm.it.po 27 Aug 2013 07:08:18 -0000 1.6
+++ sco-v-ibm.it.po 1 Jan 2014 13:35:04 -0000 1.7
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: sco-v-ibm.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-26 08:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-01 13:32+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-08-27 08:46+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian\n"
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-01 13:32+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid "FSF Statement on SCO v. IBM - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -129,6 +130,62 @@
"eseguite esclusivamente dal sistema operativo Unix. "
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has
+# | SCO alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of
+# | which SCO is by intermediate transactions the successor in
+# | interest—have been incorporated by IBM in the kernel, Linux, or in
+# | parts of GNU? If the former, there is no justification for the broad
+# | statements urging the Fortune 1500 to be cautious about using free
+# | software, or GNU programs generally. If, on the other hand, SCO claims
+# | that GNU contains any Unix trade secret or copyrighted material, the claim
+# | is almost surely false. Contributors to the GNU Project promise to follow
+# | the Free Software Foundation's rules for the project, which
+# | specify—among other things—that contributors must not enter
+# | into non-disclosure agreements for technical information relevant to their
+# | work on GNU programs, and that they must not consult or make any use of
+# | source code from non-free programs, including specifically Unix. The
+# | Foundation has no basis to believe that GNU contains any material about
+# | which SCO or anyone else could assert valid trade secret or copyright
+# | claims. Contributors could have made misrepresentations of fact in their
+# | copyright assignment statements, but failing willful misrepresentation by
+# | a contributor, which has never happened so far as the Foundation is aware,
+# | there is no significant likelihood that our supervision of the freedom of
+# | our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that despite the
+# | alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation has not been
+# | sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work whose
+# | copyright the Foundation [-holds-including-] {+holds—including+} all
+# | of IBM's modifications to the kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe
+# | computers, assigned to the Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts
+# | infringes its rights in any way.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has "
+#| "SCO alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of "
+#| "which SCO is by intermediate transactions the successor in interest—"
+#| "have been incorporated by IBM in the kernel, Linux, or in parts of GNU? "
+#| "If the former, there is no justification for the broad statements urging "
+#| "the Fortune 1500 to be cautious about using free software, or GNU "
+#| "programs generally. If, on the other hand, SCO claims that GNU contains "
+#| "any Unix trade secret or copyrighted material, the claim is almost surely "
+#| "false. Contributors to the GNU Project promise to follow the Free "
+#| "Software Foundation's rules for the project, which specify—among "
+#| "other things—that contributors must not enter into non-disclosure "
+#| "agreements for technical information relevant to their work on GNU "
+#| "programs, and that they must not consult or make any use of source code "
+#| "from non-free programs, including specifically Unix. The Foundation has "
+#| "no basis to believe that GNU contains any material about which SCO or "
+#| "anyone else could assert valid trade secret or copyright claims. "
+#| "Contributors could have made misrepresentations of fact in their "
+#| "copyright assignment statements, but failing willful misrepresentation by "
+#| "a contributor, which has never happened so far as the Foundation is "
+#| "aware, there is no significant likelihood that our supervision of the "
+#| "freedom of our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that "
+#| "despite the alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation "
+#| "has not been sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work "
+#| "whose copyright the Foundation holds-including all of IBM's modifications "
+#| "to the kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to "
+#| "the Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any "
+#| "way."
msgid ""
"SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has SCO "
"alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of which SCO "
@@ -152,9 +209,9 @@
"our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that despite the "
"alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation has not been "
"sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work whose copyright "
-"the Foundation holds-including all of IBM's modifications to the kernel for "
-"use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to the Foundation by "
-"IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any way."
+"the Foundation holds—including all of IBM's modifications to the "
+"kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to the "
+"Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any way."
msgstr ""
"L'utilizzo fuorviante dei nomi da parte di SCO rende poco chiare le basi "
"delle loro affermazioni: SCO sostiene forse che segreti industriali del "
Index: sco-v-ibm.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -b -r1.10 -r1.11
--- sco-v-ibm.pot 26 Aug 2013 09:00:50 -0000 1.10
+++ sco-v-ibm.pot 1 Jan 2014 13:35:04 -0000 1.11
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: sco-v-ibm.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-26 08:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-01 13:32+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -111,9 +111,9 @@
"our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that despite the "
"alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation has not been "
"sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work whose copyright "
-"the Foundation holds-including all of IBM's modifications to the kernel for "
-"use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to the Foundation by "
-"IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any way."
+"the Foundation holds—including all of IBM's modifications to the "
+"kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to the "
+"Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any way."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
Index: sco-v-ibm.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/sco/po/sco-v-ibm.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- sco-v-ibm.ru.po 26 Aug 2013 09:29:28 -0000 1.4
+++ sco-v-ibm.ru.po 1 Jan 2014 13:35:04 -0000 1.5
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: sco-v-ibm.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-26 08:55+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2014-01-01 13:32+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-08-26 16:21+0400\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2014-01-01 13:32+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid "FSF Statement on SCO v. IBM - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -130,6 +131,62 @@
"вÑполнÑвÑиеÑÑ ÑолÑко опеÑаÑионной
ÑиÑÑемой Unix."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has
+# | SCO alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of
+# | which SCO is by intermediate transactions the successor in
+# | interest—have been incorporated by IBM in the kernel, Linux, or in
+# | parts of GNU? If the former, there is no justification for the broad
+# | statements urging the Fortune 1500 to be cautious about using free
+# | software, or GNU programs generally. If, on the other hand, SCO claims
+# | that GNU contains any Unix trade secret or copyrighted material, the claim
+# | is almost surely false. Contributors to the GNU Project promise to follow
+# | the Free Software Foundation's rules for the project, which
+# | specify—among other things—that contributors must not enter
+# | into non-disclosure agreements for technical information relevant to their
+# | work on GNU programs, and that they must not consult or make any use of
+# | source code from non-free programs, including specifically Unix. The
+# | Foundation has no basis to believe that GNU contains any material about
+# | which SCO or anyone else could assert valid trade secret or copyright
+# | claims. Contributors could have made misrepresentations of fact in their
+# | copyright assignment statements, but failing willful misrepresentation by
+# | a contributor, which has never happened so far as the Foundation is aware,
+# | there is no significant likelihood that our supervision of the freedom of
+# | our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that despite the
+# | alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation has not been
+# | sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work whose
+# | copyright the Foundation [-holds-including-] {+holds—including+} all
+# | of IBM's modifications to the kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe
+# | computers, assigned to the Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts
+# | infringes its rights in any way.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has "
+#| "SCO alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of "
+#| "which SCO is by intermediate transactions the successor in interest—"
+#| "have been incorporated by IBM in the kernel, Linux, or in parts of GNU? "
+#| "If the former, there is no justification for the broad statements urging "
+#| "the Fortune 1500 to be cautious about using free software, or GNU "
+#| "programs generally. If, on the other hand, SCO claims that GNU contains "
+#| "any Unix trade secret or copyrighted material, the claim is almost surely "
+#| "false. Contributors to the GNU Project promise to follow the Free "
+#| "Software Foundation's rules for the project, which specify—among "
+#| "other things—that contributors must not enter into non-disclosure "
+#| "agreements for technical information relevant to their work on GNU "
+#| "programs, and that they must not consult or make any use of source code "
+#| "from non-free programs, including specifically Unix. The Foundation has "
+#| "no basis to believe that GNU contains any material about which SCO or "
+#| "anyone else could assert valid trade secret or copyright claims. "
+#| "Contributors could have made misrepresentations of fact in their "
+#| "copyright assignment statements, but failing willful misrepresentation by "
+#| "a contributor, which has never happened so far as the Foundation is "
+#| "aware, there is no significant likelihood that our supervision of the "
+#| "freedom of our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that "
+#| "despite the alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation "
+#| "has not been sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work "
+#| "whose copyright the Foundation holds-including all of IBM's modifications "
+#| "to the kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to "
+#| "the Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any "
+#| "way."
msgid ""
"SCO's confusing use of names makes the basis of its claims unclear: has SCO "
"alleged that trade secrets of Unix's originator, AT&T—of which SCO "
@@ -153,9 +210,9 @@
"our free software has failed. The Foundation notes that despite the "
"alarmist statements SCO's employees have made, the Foundation has not been "
"sued, nor has SCO, despite our requests, identified any work whose copyright "
-"the Foundation holds-including all of IBM's modifications to the kernel for "
-"use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to the Foundation by "
-"IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any way."
+"the Foundation holds—including all of IBM's modifications to the "
+"kernel for use with IBM's S/390 mainframe computers, assigned to the "
+"Foundation by IBM—that SCO asserts infringes its rights in any way."
msgstr ""
"ÐеÑпоÑÑдоÑное ÑпоÑÑебление названий
гÑÑппой SCO Ð´ÐµÐ»Ð°ÐµÑ Ð½ÐµÑÑнÑм оÑнование ее "
"заÑвлений: ÑÑвеÑÐ¶Ð´Ð°ÐµÑ Ð»Ð¸ SCO, ÑÑо
коммеÑÑеÑÐºÐ°Ñ Ñайна компании AT&T, из "
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy/sco/po sco-v-ibm.fr.po sco-v-ibm...,
GNUN <=