www/licenses hessla.html

[Richard M. Stallman]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Richard M. Stallman <rms>       13/02/07 09:09:26

Modified files:
        licenses       : hessla.html 

Log message:
        Small fixes; link to must-not-limit-freedom-to-run.html.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/hessla.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19

Patches:
Index: hessla.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/hessla.html,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- hessla.html 10 Jun 2012 08:04:11 -0000      1.18
+++ hessla.html 7 Feb 2013 09:09:26 -0000       1.19
@@ -24,12 +24,13 @@
 <p>
 If we were ever going to make an exception to our principles of free
 software, here would be the place to do it.  But it would be a mistake
-to do so: it would weaken our general stand, and would achieve
-nothing.  Trying to stop those particular activities with a software
-license is either unnecessary or ineffective.</p>
+to do so: <a href="/philosophy/must-not-limit-freedom-to-run.html"> it
+would do harm to free software movement and would achieve nothing.</a>
+Trying to stop those particular activities with a software license is
+either unnecessary or ineffective.</p>
 <p>
 In regard to modified versions, the HESSLA's restrictions are
-unnecessary.  The GNU GPL is sufficient protection against
+unnecessary.  The GNU GPL is, in general, sufficient protection against
 privacy-violating features, because it ensures that someone can get
 the source code, find the spyware feature, and publish an improved
 version of the software which does not have the feature.  Users can
@@ -76,7 +77,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2012/06/10 08:04:11 $
+$Date: 2013/02/07 09:09:26 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>