[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www distros/screenshot.html software/year2000.h...
|
From: |
Pavel Kharitonov |
|
Subject: |
www distros/screenshot.html software/year2000.h... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2013 05:24:29 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Pavel Kharitonov <ineiev> 13/01/28 05:24:29
Modified files:
distros : screenshot.html
software : year2000.html year2000-list.html
Log message:
Update boilerplate to 1.72.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/screenshot.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/software/year2000.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/software/year2000-list.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
Patches:
Index: distros/screenshot.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/screenshot.html,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- distros/screenshot.html 10 Jun 2012 07:58:37 -0000 1.19
+++ distros/screenshot.html 28 Jan 2013 05:24:28 -0000 1.20
@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<title>Screenshot of a Free Distro - GNU Operating System</title>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.72 -->
+<title>Screenshot of a Free Distro
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/screenshot.translist" -->
+<h2>Screenshot of a Free Distro</h2>
<p><a href="/distros/free-distros.html"><img src="/graphics/t-desktop-4.jpg"
alt="Screenshot of the GNU/Linux operating system running OpenOffice.org, a
free software office suite comparable to Microsoft Office or Apple iWork"
width="100%" /></a></p>
@@ -15,26 +18,49 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
-<p>
-Please send FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<br />
-Please send broken links and other corrections or suggestions to
-<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.
-</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.</p>
-<p>
-Please see the
-<a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
-README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting
-translations of this article.
-</p>
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2010, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
-<p>
-Copyright © 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
@@ -43,11 +69,10 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2012/06/10 07:58:37 $
+$Date: 2013/01/28 05:24:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
-
</div>
</body>
</html>
Index: software/year2000.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/software/year2000.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- software/year2000.html 10 Jun 2012 08:09:56 -0000 1.8
+++ software/year2000.html 28 Jan 2013 05:24:28 -0000 1.9
@@ -1,64 +1,59 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<title>Year 2000 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)</title>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.72 -->
+<title>Year 2000 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<!--#set var="article_name" value="/software/year2000" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/gnun/initial-translations-list.html" -->
<h2>GNU Software in the Year 2000</h2>
-[ English
-| <A HREF="/software/year2000.ko.html">Korean</A>
-| <A HREF="/software/year2000.es.html">Spanish</A>
-| <A HREF="/software/year2000.pt-br.html">Brazilian Portuguese</A>
-]
-
-<P>
-Koos Schut maintains a <A HREF="/software/year2000-list.html">list of
+<p>
+Koos Schut maintains a <a href="/software/year2000-list.html">list of
GNU Software packages with information about Year 2000 properties
-collected from volunteer users</A>. That list is offered as a guide
+collected from volunteer users</a>. That list is offered as a guide
and should not be construed as the record of a formal testing program
or as providing any guarantee of compliance or noncompliance.
+</p>
-<P>
+<p>
The Free Software Foundation does not provide warranties for its
software. We can't afford to. So we can't promise that GNU software
has no Year 2000 bugs, any more than we could promise you the same
thing about another sort of bug. But we can tell you some reasons why
such bugs are probably very few.
+</p>
-<P>
+<p>
The main reason is theoretical. GNU systems, and Unix-like systems
generally, represent a date/time as a 32-bit integer, counting seconds
from the beginning of 1970. This 32-bit count will overflow in 2038;
but there will be no problem in that year, because by then all systems
will have redefined <code>time_t</code> to be a 64-bit integer.
+</p>
-<P>
+<p>
We also have some practical evidence that such
problems are not widespread. Some users running a
-<A HREF="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">Linux-based GNU system</A>,
+<a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">Linux-based GNU system</a>,
specifically Debian GNU/Linux, used their machines for a while
with the clocks set forward to the year 2000. They reported no
special problems.
-</P>
+</p>
-<P>
+<p>
You can check that you are using the latest release of any particular
GNU program by checking one of our
-<A HREF="/prep/ftp.html">FTP mirror sites</A>.
+<a href="/prep/ftp.html">FTP mirror sites</a>.
The <code>ls-lR</code> file in the
root directory of one of our FTP servers could be useful to get a list of all
available versions.
-<P>
+</p>
+
+<p>
If you do encounter any problems with GNU software, even if they are
not related to the year 2000, you should send a bug report to the
developers of the program.
-<HR>
-
+</p>
-<!-- If needed, change the copyright block at the bottom. In general,
- all pages on the GNU web server should have the section about
- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking
- with the webmasters first.
- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
- and that it is like this: "2001, 2002", not this: "2001-2002". -->
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
@@ -66,31 +61,56 @@
<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
-<p>Please see the <a
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
of this article.</p>
-<p>Copyright © 2000, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
-
-<p>Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article are
-permitted worldwide, without royalty, in any medium, provided this
-notice, and the copyright notice, are preserved.</p>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2000, 2011, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2012/06/10 08:09:56 $
+$Date: 2013/01/28 05:24:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
-
-<div id="translations">
-<h4>Translations of this page</h4>
-
-</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Index: software/year2000-list.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/software/year2000-list.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- software/year2000-list.html 24 Oct 2011 19:35:05 -0000 1.4
+++ software/year2000-list.html 28 Jan 2013 05:24:28 -0000 1.5
@@ -1,40 +1,26 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">
-<HTML>
-<HEAD>
-<TITLE>Year 2000 List - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)</TITLE>
-<LINK REV="made" HREF="mailto:address@hidden";>
-</HEAD>
-<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" TEXT="#000000" LINK="#1F00FF" ALINK="#FF0000"
VLINK="#9900DD">
-<H3>List GNU Software and Year 2000 Problems</H3>
-
-<A HREF="/graphics/agnuhead.html"><IMG SRC="/graphics/gnu-head-sm.jpg"
- ALT=" [image of the Head of a GNU] "
- WIDTH="129" HEIGHT="122"></A>
-
-[ English
-| <A HREF="/software/year2000-list.ko.html">Korean</A>
-]
-
-<P>
-<H4>Table of Contents</H4>
-
-<UL>
- <LI><A HREF="year2000-list.html#Information"
- NAME="TOCInformation">Information about this list</A>
- <LI><A HREF="year2000-list.html#OK"
- NAME="TOCOK">GNU Software which has passed the Year 2000 checks</A>
- <LI><A HREF="year2000-list.html#Strange"
- NAME="TOCStrange">GNU Software which might be okay</A>
- <LI><A HREF="year2000-list.html#NotOK"
- NAME="TOCNotOK">GNU Software which is NOT OK</A>
- <LI><A HREF="year2000-list.html#NotChecked"
- NAME="TOCNotChecked">GNU Software which has not yet been checked</A>
-</UL>
-
-<HR>
-<H4><A HREF="year2000-list.html#TOCInformation"
- NAME="Information">Information about this list</A></H4>
-<P>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.72 -->
+<title>Year 2000 List - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<!--#set var="article_name" value="/software/year2000-list" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/gnun/initial-translations-list.html" -->
+<h2>List GNU Software and Year 2000 Problems</h2>
+
+<h3>Table of Contents</h3>
+
+<ul>
+ <li><a href="#Information">Information about this list</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#OK">GNU Software which has passed the Year 2000
+ checks</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#Strange">GNU Software which might be okay</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#NotOK">GNU Software which is NOT OK</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#NotChecked">GNU Software which has not yet been
+ checked</a></li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="Information">Information about this list</h3>
+
+<p>
This description of the Y2K readiness of GNU software packages is
a Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure as defined in the Year 2000
Information and Readiness Disclosure Act. This description of our
@@ -45,674 +31,615 @@
copyright holders of these GNU software packages or the FSF be
liable to you for any damages or claims based upon the information
contained herein.
-<P>
+</p><p>
The information given below has been provided by Koos Schut working as a
volunteer. The FSF is not the source of the information and has
not verified or tested the accuracy of the evaluations; all the
information has been brought here from Koos Schut's Y2K web page
with his help.
-<P>
+</p><p>
To make this list more useful, two things are very welcome.
First: if you have any year-2000 information of GNU packages of which
the year-2000 status is not known in this list, please share it with
-<A HREF="mailto:address@hidden";>Koos Schut</A>. Second: if you have
independently-derived year-2000
-information, please share that with <A HREF="mailto:address@hidden";>Koos
Schut</A>, too, since two different
-checks are much more reliable than one.<P>
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden";>Koos Schut</a>. Second: if you have
independently-derived year-2000
+information, please share that with <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>Koos
Schut</a>, too, since two different
+checks are much more reliable than one.</p>
+<p>
There is no year-2000 information avalable on packages which are not
mentioned in this list.
-<P>
+</p>
-<H4><A HREF="year2000-list.html#TOCOK"
- NAME="OK">GNU Software which has passed the Year 2000 checks</A></H4>
-<P>
-<UL>
- <LI><STRONG>acct-6.3</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Uses 4-digit year<P>
- <LI><STRONG>ae</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in sources<P>
- <LI><STRONG>aegis</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Lots of <STRONG>correct</STRONG> year manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>apache-1.3</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Claimed to be okay by the authors<P>
- <LI><STRONG>apache-1.3.3</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Passed Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>autoconf-2.10</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in sources<P>
- <LI><STRONG>autoconf-2.12</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in sources<P>
- <LI><STRONG>automake-1.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>automake-1.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>automake-1.4</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>bash-2.02</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Uses ctime for prompt only<P>
- <LI><STRONG>bc-1.05</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>bison-1.24</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in sources<P>
- <LI><STRONG>bison-1.25</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in sources<P>
- <LI><STRONG>bison-1.27</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in sources<P>
- <LI><STRONG>button-14.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>calc-2.02f</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>cfengine-1.4.12</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>clisp-1997.09.25</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>clx-5.02</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- LISP files<P>
- <LI><STRONG>cook-2.4</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- 4-digit years<P>
- <LI><STRONG>cperf-2.1a</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>cvs-1.10</STRONG> (OK last update 19991217)<BR>
- Claimed OK, passed Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>ddd-2.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>dejagnu-1.3</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Correct use of tm_year<P>
- <LI><STRONG>diffutils-2.7</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>dirent</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>dld-3.3</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>doschk-1.1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>ed-0.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>elib-1.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Only elisp functions which does no date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>emacs-20.3</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Passed Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>enscript-1.6.1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- This update fixed the various year2000 problems<P>
- <LI><STRONG>es-0.9alpha1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>f2c</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>findutils-4.1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Can do 4-digit years<P>
- <LI><STRONG>finger-1.37</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Does simple date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>flex-2.5.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>flex-2.5.4a</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>fontutils-0.6</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gawk-3.0.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Can do 4-digit years<P>
- <LI><STRONG>g++-2.5.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Does simple date-manipulation with tm_year<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gcc-2.7.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>gcc-2.7.2.1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>gcc-2.7.2.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>gcc-2.8.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No Year2000 problems found<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gcc-2.8.1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Passed Y2K tests<P>
- Tested for date-rollover to 2000-01-01 and 2000-02-29 <P>
- <LI><STRONG>gcl-2.2.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gdbm-1.7.3</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code, passed Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gettext-0.10</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Uses tm_year correctly<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gforth-0.3.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Uses tm_year + 1900 correctly<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gforth-0.4.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Uses tm_year + 1900 correctly<P>
- <LI><STRONG>ghostscript-5.10</STRONG> (OK last update 19991217)<BR>
- Passed Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>ghostview-1.5</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Passed Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>git-4.3.17</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Correct tm_year usage<P>
- <LI><STRONG>glibc-crypt-2.0.6</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>glibc-linuxthreads-2.0.6</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>glibc-localdata-2.0.6</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gmp-2.0.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gnans</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Makes no assumption of year < 2000<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gnuchess-4.0pl79</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gnulogo-1.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gnuplot-3.5</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gnushlogi-1.2p03</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gnussl-0.2.1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gperf-2.7</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>grep-2.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>grep-2.1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>groff-1.12</STRONG> (OK last update 19991217)<BR>
- Y2k fixed.
-
- <LI><STRONG>gst-115</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gstep-core</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Correct usage of tm_year<P>
- <LI><STRONG>guile-1.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Correct usage of tm_year<P>
- <LI><STRONG>guile-1.3</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Correct usage of tm_year, passed Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gzip-1.2.4a</STRONG> OK<BR>
- Hardly any date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gzip-1.2.4</STRONG> (OK last update 19991217)<BR>
- Difference with 1.2.4a is an email address, only, and it has passed Y2K
tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>hello-1.3</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>hp2xx-3.1.4</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>hurd-0.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Some date manipulation, but alls seems okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>hyperbole-4.01</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>id-utils-3.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>indent-1.9.1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>intlfonts-1.1</STRONG><BR>
- No code with date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>ispell-3.1.20</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in sourc code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>less-3.3.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in sourc code, passed Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>libobjects-0.1.19</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Correct usage of tm_year<P>
- <LI><STRONG>libtool-1.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>lilypond-1.0.17</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>m4-1.4</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>malloc-?</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Doesn't do any date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>maxima-5.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>mcsim-4.2.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>miscfiles-1.1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No source code with date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>mm-1.07</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Appears to be okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>motti-1.0</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>mtools-3.8</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Is tested: see
- <a
-
href="http://www.tux.org/pub/tux/knaff/mtools/y2k.html";>http://www.tux.org/pub/tux/knaff/mtools/y2k.html</a>
<P>
- <LI><STRONG>netpbm-9403</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in sourc code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>nethack-3.2.3</STRONG> (OK last update 19991217)<BR>
+<h3 id="OK">GNU Software which has passed the Year 2000 checks</h3>
+<ul>
+ <li><strong>acct-6.3</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Uses 4-digit year</li>
+ <li><strong>ae</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in sources</li>
+ <li><strong>aegis</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Lots of <strong>correct</strong> year manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>apache-1.3</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Claimed to be okay by the authors</li>
+ <li><strong>apache-1.3.3</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>autoconf-2.10</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in sources</li>
+ <li><strong>autoconf-2.12</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in sources</li>
+ <li><strong>automake-1.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>automake-1.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>automake-1.4</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>bash-2.02</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Uses ctime for prompt only</li>
+ <li><strong>bc-1.05</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>bison-1.24</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in sources</li>
+ <li><strong>bison-1.25</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in sources</li>
+ <li><strong>bison-1.27</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in sources</li>
+ <li><strong>button-14.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>calc-2.02f</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>cfengine-1.4.12</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>clisp-1997.09.25</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>clx-5.02</strong> (OK)<br />
+ LISP files</li>
+ <li><strong>cook-2.4</strong> (OK)<br />
+ 4-digit years</li>
+ <li><strong>cperf-2.1a</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>cvs-1.10</strong> (OK last update 19991217)<br />
+ Claimed OK, passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>ddd-2.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>dejagnu-1.3</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Correct use of tm_year</li>
+ <li><strong>diffutils-2.7</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>dirent</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>dld-3.3</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>doschk-1.1</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>ed-0.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>elib-1.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Only elisp functions which does no date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>emacs-20.3</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>enscript-1.6.1</strong> (OK)<br />
+ This update fixed the various year2000 problems</li>
+ <li><strong>es-0.9alpha1</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>f2c</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>findutils-4.1</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Can do 4-digit years</li>
+ <li><strong>finger-1.37</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Does simple date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>flex-2.5.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>flex-2.5.4a</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>fontutils-0.6</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>gawk-3.0.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Can do 4-digit years</li>
+ <li><strong>g++-2.5.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Does simple date-manipulation with tm_year</li>
+ <li><strong>gcc-2.7.2</strong> (OK)</li>
+ <li><strong>gcc-2.7.2.1</strong> (OK)</li>
+ <li><strong>gcc-2.7.2.2</strong> (OK)</li>
+ <li><strong>gcc-2.8.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No Year2000 problems found</li>
+ <li><strong>gcc-2.8.1</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Passed Y2K tests
+ <p>Tested for date-rollover to 2000-01-01 and 2000-02-29</p>
+ </li>
+ <li><strong>gcl-2.2.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>gdbm-1.7.3</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code, passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>gettext-0.10</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Uses tm_year correctly</li>
+ <li><strong>gforth-0.3.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Uses tm_year + 1900 correctly</li>
+ <li><strong>gforth-0.4.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Uses tm_year + 1900 correctly</li>
+ <li><strong>ghostscript-5.10</strong> (OK last update 19991217)<br />
+ Passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>ghostview-1.5</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>git-4.3.17</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Correct tm_year usage</li>
+ <li><strong>glibc-crypt-2.0.6</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>glibc-linuxthreads-2.0.6</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>glibc-localdata-2.0.6</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>gmp-2.0.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>gnans</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Makes no assumption of year < 2000</li>
+ <li><strong>gnuchess-4.0pl79</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>gnulogo-1.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>gnuplot-3.5</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>gnushlogi-1.2p03</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>gnussl-0.2.1</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>gperf-2.7</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>grep-2.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>grep-2.1</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>groff-1.12</strong> (OK last update 19991217)<br />
+ Y2k fixed.</li>
+
+ <li><strong>gst-115</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>gstep-core</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Correct usage of tm_year</li>
+ <li><strong>guile-1.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Correct usage of tm_year</li>
+ <li><strong>guile-1.3</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Correct usage of tm_year, passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>gzip-1.2.4a</strong> OK<br />
+ Hardly any date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>gzip-1.2.4</strong> (OK last update 19991217)<br />
+ Difference with 1.2.4a is an email address, only, and it has
+passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>hello-1.3</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>hp2xx-3.1.4</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>hurd-0.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Some date manipulation, but alls seems okay</li>
+ <li><strong>hyperbole-4.01</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>id-utils-3.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>indent-1.9.1</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>intlfonts-1.1</strong><br />
+ No code with date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>ispell-3.1.20</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in sourc code</li>
+ <li><strong>less-3.3.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in sourc code, passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>libobjects-0.1.19</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Correct usage of tm_year</li>
+ <li><strong>libtool-1.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>lilypond-1.0.17</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>m4-1.4</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>malloc-?</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Doesn't do any date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>maxima-5.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>mcsim-4.2.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>miscfiles-1.1</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No source code with date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>mm-1.07</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Appears to be okay</li>
+ <li><strong>motti-1.0</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>mtools-3.8</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Is tested: see <a
+ href="http://www.tux.org/pub/tux/knaff/mtools/y2k.html";>
+ http://www.tux.org/pub/tux/knaff/mtools/y2k.html</a>
+ </li>
+ <li><strong>netpbm-9403</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in sourc code</li>
+ <li><strong>nethack-3.2.3</strong> (OK last update 19991217)<br />
OK according <a
-
href="http://www.nethack.org/v330/info.html#Y2K";>http://www.nethack.org/v330/info.html#Y2K</a>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>nethack-3.3</STRONG> (OK last update 19991217)<BR>
+ href="http://www.nethack.org/v330/info.html#Y2K";>
+ http://www.nethack.org/v330/info.html#Y2K</a>
+ </li>
+ <li><strong>nethack-3.3</strong> (OK last update 19991217)<br />
OK according <a
-
href="http://www.nethack.org/v330/info.html#Y2K";>http://www.nethack.org/v330/info.html#Y2K</a>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>octave-2.0.13</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Claimed to be OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>para-0.27</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>patch-2.1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in sourc code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>patch-2.5</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in sourc code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>perl-5.002_solaris</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Passed Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>perl-5.004_04</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Claimed to be OK, passed Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>perl-5.005_02</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Claimed to be OK passed Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>perl-5.005_03</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Claimed to be OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>perl-5.005_04</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Claimed to be OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>pips-1.01</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Uses 4-digit year<P>
- <LI><STRONG>ptx-0.4</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>rcs-5.5</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Didn't find any year2000 bugs<P>
- <LI><STRONG>rcs-5.7</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Didn't find any year2000 bugs<P>
- <LI><STRONG>samba-1.9.18p10</STRONG> (OK last update 19991217)<BR>
+ href="http://www.nethack.org/v330/info.html#Y2K";>
+ http://www.nethack.org/v330/info.html#Y2K</a></li>
+ <li><strong>octave-2.0.13</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Claimed to be OK</li>
+ <li><strong>para-0.27</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>patch-2.1</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>patch-2.5</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>perl-5.002_solaris</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>perl-5.004_04</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Claimed to be OK, passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>perl-5.005_02</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Claimed to be OK passed Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>perl-5.005_03</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Claimed to be OK</li>
+ <li><strong>perl-5.005_04</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Claimed to be OK</li>
+ <li><strong>pips-1.01</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Uses 4-digit year</li>
+ <li><strong>ptx-0.4</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>rcs-5.5</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Didn't find any year2000 bugs</li>
+ <li><strong>rcs-5.7</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Didn't find any year2000 bugs</li>
+ <li><strong>samba-1.9.18p10</strong> (OK last update 19991217)<br />
OK according <a
-
href="http://www.us1.samba.org/samba/samba/docs/sambay2k.html";>http://www.us1.samba.org/samba/samba/docs/sambay2k.html</a>
-
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>screen-3.7.2</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Checked<P>
- <LI><STRONG>sed-2.0.5</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>sed-3.01</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>sharutils-4.2.1</STRONG> (OK 1999-10-25)<BR>
- Fixes the version-4.2 problems<P>
- Tests the remote's <CODE>touch</CODE> command for a way to
- specify 20xx timestamps<P>
- <LI><STRONG>sh-utils-1.16</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Thoroughly studied for year2000 bugs<P>
- <LI><STRONG>smalltalk-1.1.6</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- Is OK as of from version 1.5.beta2<P>
- <LI><STRONG>stooop-3.0.1</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>sudo-1.5</STRONG> OK<BR>
+ href="http://www.us1.samba.org/samba/samba/docs/sambay2k.html";>
+ http://www.us1.samba.org/samba/samba/docs/sambay2k.html</a></li>
+ <li><strong>screen-3.7.2</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Checked</li>
+ <li><strong>sed-2.0.5</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>sed-3.01</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>sharutils-4.2.1</strong> (OK 1999-10-25)<br />
+ Fixes the version-4.2 problems<p>
+ Tests the remote's <code>touch</code> command for a way to
+ specify 20xx timestamps</p></li>
+ <li><strong>sh-utils-1.16</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Thoroughly studied for year2000 bugs</li>
+ <li><strong>smalltalk-1.1.6</strong> (OK)<br />
+ Is OK as of from version 1.5.beta2</li>
+ <li><strong>stooop-3.0.1</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>sudo-1.5</strong> OK<br />
OK according <a
- href="http://www.courtesan.com/sudo";>http://www.courtesan.com/sudo</a>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>texinfo-3.12</STRONG> OK<BR>
- Uses tm_year correctly<P>
- <LI><STRONG>time-1.7</STRONG> OK<BR>
- Very little date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>textutils-1.19</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>textutils-1.22</STRONG> (OK)<BR>
- No suspect strings in source code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>xaos-3.0</STRONG> OK<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>xboard-4.0.2</STRONG> OK<BR>
- Correct usage of tm_year + 1900<P>
- <LI><STRONG>xemacs-21.0</STRONG> OK<BR>
- Claimed at
- <a
-
href="http://www.xemacs.org/year2000.html";>http://www.xemacs.org/year2000.html</a>
<P>
- <LI><STRONG>xinfo-1.01.01</STRONG> OK<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>xlogmaster-1.6.0</STRONG> OK<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>xshogi-1.2p03</STRONG> OK<BR>
- No year-manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>zlibc-0.9e</STRONG> OK<BR>
- No date-manipulation<P>
-</UL>
-<P>
-
-<H4><A HREF="year2000-list.html#TOCStrange"
- NAME="Strange">GNU Software which might be okay</A></H4>
-<P>
-<UL>
- <LI><STRONG>R-0.64.7</STRONG> (??)<BR>
- Claimed at
- <a
-
href="http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/R/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html";>http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/R/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html</a>
<P>
- <LI><STRONG>andrew-toolkit-5.0.0</STRONG> (??)<BR>
- Lots of date manupulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>binutils-2.9.1</STRONG> (??)<BR>
+ href="http://www.courtesan.com/sudo";>
+ http://www.courtesan.com/sudo</a></li>
+ <li><strong>texinfo-3.12</strong> OK<br />
+ Uses tm_year correctly</li>
+ <li><strong>time-1.7</strong> OK<br />
+ Very little date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>textutils-1.19</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>textutils-1.22</strong> (OK)<br />
+ No suspect strings in source code</li>
+ <li><strong>xaos-3.0</strong> OK<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>xboard-4.0.2</strong> OK<br />
+ Correct usage of tm_year + 1900</li>
+ <li><strong>xemacs-21.0</strong> OK<br />
+ Claimed at <a
+ href="http://www.xemacs.org/year2000.html";>
+ http://www.xemacs.org/year2000.html</a></li>
+ <li><strong>xinfo-1.01.01</strong> OK<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>xlogmaster-1.6.0</strong> OK<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>xshogi-1.2p03</strong> OK<br />
+ No year-manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>zlibc-0.9e</strong> OK<br />
+ No date-manipulation</li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id ="Strange">GNU Software which might be okay</h3>
+<ul>
+ <li><strong>R-0.64.7</strong> (??)<br />
+ Claimed at <a
+ href="http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/R/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html";>
+ http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/R/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html</a></li>
+ <li><strong>andrew-toolkit-5.0.0</strong> (??)<br />
+ Lots of date manupulation</li>
+ <li><strong>binutils-2.9.1</strong> (??)<br />
Correct tm_year + 1900, awful lot of date-like code, tested
- for date-rollover to 2000-01-01 and 2000-02-29.<P>
- <LI><STRONG>cpio-2.4.2</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Uses some date manipulation, but appears okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>emacs-20.2</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lots of potential Year2000 problems, but seems mosly okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>fileutils-3.16</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lots of potential year2000 problems, but appears mostly okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>fileutils-4.0</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lots of potential year2000 problems, but appears mostly okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gawk-3.0.3</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lots of tm_year manipulation, but appears okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gcal-2.40</STRONG><BR>
- Awful lot of year manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>glibc-2.0.6</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lots of year manipulation, but appears mostly okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>libg++-2.8.0</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lots of potential year2000 code, but appears okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>libstdc++-2.8.0</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lots of potential year2000 code, but appears okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>lynx-2.8</STRONG><BR>
- Lots of strange year manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>make-3.77</STRONG><BR>
+ for date-rollover to 2000-01-01 and 2000-02-29.</li>
+ <li><strong>cpio-2.4.2</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Uses some date manipulation, but appears okay</li>
+ <li><strong>emacs-20.2</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lots of potential Year2000 problems, but seems mosly okay</li>
+ <li><strong>fileutils-3.16</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lots of potential year2000 problems, but appears mostly okay</li>
+ <li><strong>fileutils-4.0</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lots of potential year2000 problems, but appears mostly okay</li>
+ <li><strong>gawk-3.0.3</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lots of tm_year manipulation, but appears okay</li>
+ <li><strong>gcal-2.40</strong><br />
+ Awful lot of year manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>glibc-2.0.6</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lots of year manipulation, but appears mostly okay</li>
+ <li><strong>libg++-2.8.0</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lots of potential year2000 code, but appears okay</li>
+ <li><strong>libstdc++-2.8.0</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lots of potential year2000 code, but appears okay</li>
+ <li><strong>lynx-2.8</strong><br />
+ Lots of strange year manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>make-3.77</strong><br />
Lots of potential year2000 code, but appears okay, tested
- for date-rollover to 2000-01-01 and 2000-02-29.<P>
- <LI><STRONG>make-3.76.1</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lots of potential year2000 code, but appears okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>mc-4.1</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lots of year manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>oleo-1.6</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
+ for date-rollover to 2000-01-01 and 2000-02-29.</li>
+ <li><strong>make-3.76.1</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lots of potential year2000 code, but appears okay</li>
+ <li><strong>mc-4.1</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lots of year manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>oleo-1.6</strong> (OK?)<br />
Lot of year manipulation....is inconsistent about leap
- years. Problem will not appear in 2000 (might in 2400)<P>
- <LI><STRONG>pcl-gcl-2.1</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lisp code, no date manipulation<P>
- <LI><STRONG>tar-1.12</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lots of potential Year2000 code, but appears okay<P>
- <LI><STRONG>wget-1.5.3</STRONG> (OK?)<BR>
- Lots of potential Year2000 code, but appears okay<P>
-</UL>
-<P>
-
-<H4><A HREF="year2000-list.html#TOCNotOK"
- NAME="NotOK">GNU Software which is NOT OK</A></H4>
-<P>
-<UL>
- <LI><STRONG>cvs-1.8</STRONG><BR>
- Claimed to have problems<P>
- <LI><STRONG>cvs-1.9</STRONG><BR>
- Claimed to have problems<P>
- <LI><STRONG>dgs-0.5.0</STRONG> NOT OK<BR>
- Mostly okay, but is having trouble in the ras2tif code<P>
- <LI><STRONG>ecc</STRONG> NOT OK<BR>
- Not OK for other reasons<P>
- <LI><STRONG>elm-2.4</STRONG> NOT OK<BR>
- Did not pass Y2K tests<P>
- <LI><STRONG>enscript-1.4.0</STRONG> NOT OK<BR>
- Assumes run_tm.tm_year to have two digits<P>
- <LI><STRONG>enscript-1.5.0</STRONG> NOT OK<BR>
- Assumes run_tm.tm_year to have two digits<P>
- <LI><STRONG>exim-2.02</STRONG> NOT OK<BR>
- Assumes years to be between 1990 and 2090<P>
- <LI><STRONG>g77-0.5.23</STRONG> NOT OK<BR>
+ years. Problem will not appear in 2000 (might in 2400)</li>
+ <li><strong>pcl-gcl-2.1</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lisp code, no date manipulation</li>
+ <li><strong>tar-1.12</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lots of potential Year2000 code, but appears okay</li>
+ <li><strong>wget-1.5.3</strong> (OK?)<br />
+ Lots of potential Year2000 code, but appears okay</li>
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="NotOK">GNU Software which is NOT OK</h3>
+
+<ul>
+ <li><strong>cvs-1.8</strong><br />
+ Claimed to have problems</li>
+ <li><strong>cvs-1.9</strong><br />
+ Claimed to have problems</li>
+ <li><strong>dgs-0.5.0</strong> NOT OK<br />
+ Mostly okay, but is having trouble in the ras2tif code</li>
+ <li><strong>ecc</strong> NOT OK<br />
+ Not OK for other reasons</li>
+ <li><strong>elm-2.4</strong> NOT OK<br />
+ Did not pass Y2K tests</li>
+ <li><strong>enscript-1.4.0</strong> NOT OK<br />
+ Assumes run_tm.tm_year to have two digits</li>
+ <li><strong>enscript-1.5.0</strong> NOT OK<br />
+ Assumes run_tm.tm_year to have two digits</li>
+ <li><strong>exim-2.02</strong> NOT OK<br />
+ Assumes years to be between 1990 and 2090</li>
+ <li><strong>g77-0.5.23</strong> NOT OK<br />
Correct usage of tm_year. However, the IDATE (VXT) intrinsic returns
a two-digit year. In 2000 it is supposed to return 0, but will return
100 instead. Programs printing that number as a two-digit field
might therefore print "**" instead of "00", "01", etc.
Version 0.5.24 will fix this, and it is already fixed in the
- egcs-1.1.2 version.
- <LI><STRONG>gnats-3.2</STRONG> NOT OK<BR>
- Uses some strange date manipulation in getdate.c<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gnumach-1.1.3</STRONG> NOT OK<BR>
- Strange date manipulations<P>
- <LI><STRONG>groff-1.11a</STRONG> NOT-OK (last update 19991217)<BR>
+ egcs-1.1.2 version.</li>
+ <li><strong>gnats-3.2</strong> NOT OK<br />
+ Uses some strange date manipulation in getdate.c</li>
+ <li><strong>gnumach-1.1.3</strong> NOT OK<br />
+ Strange date manipulations</li>
+ <li><strong>groff-1.11a</strong> NOT-OK (last update 19991217)<br />
Did not pass Y2K tests (common *roff family). These are rather
- harmless.<P>
- <LI><STRONG>inetutils-1.3b</STRONG> NOT-OK<BR>
- Replies to the ftp client with a 2 year date<P>
- <LI><STRONG>metahtml-5.09</STRONG> NOT-OK<BR>
- Did not pass Y2K tests (heavy repairs required)<P>
- <LI><STRONG>perl-4.036</STRONG> NOT-OK (last update 19991217)<BR>
- Newer version is claimed OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>sharutils-4.2</STRONG> NOT-OK (1999-10-29)<BR>
- Prints %2d, tm_year in shar.c, fixed in version 4.2.1<P>
- <LI><STRONG>smalltalk-1.1.5</STRONG> NOT-OK<BR>
- uses 31 bit signed int which overflows in 2004<P>
- <LI><STRONG>nethack-3.2.2</STRONG> NOT-OK (last update 19991217)<BR>
- writes records in %02d%02d%02d", lt->tm_year ... format<P>
- <LI><STRONG>tar-1.11.8</STRONG> NOT-OK (last update 20000118)<BR>
- The following will work OK:<BR>
- tar -czf dest.tgz --newer-mtime=Jan5,1999 sources<BR>
- The following will not work OK:<BR>
- tar -czf dest.tgz --newer-mtime=Jan5,2000 sources<BR>
- tar: Invalid date-format 'Jan5,2000'<P>
- <LI><STRONG>tiff-3.4b035</STRONG> NOT-OK<BR>
- Assumes 19xx years<P>
- <LI><STRONG>tiff-3.4b037</STRONG> NOT-OK<BR>
- Assumes 19xx years<P>
- <LI><STRONG>X11R6</STRONG> NOT-OK (last update 19991217)<BR>
- Did not pass Y2K tests<P>
-
+ harmless.</li>
+ <li><strong>inetutils-1.3b</strong> NOT-OK<br />
+ Replies to the ftp client with a 2 year date</li>
+ <li><strong>metahtml-5.09</strong> NOT-OK<br />
+ Did not pass Y2K tests (heavy repairs required)</li>
+ <li><strong>perl-4.036</strong> NOT-OK (last update 19991217)<br />
+ Newer version is claimed OK</li>
+ <li><strong>sharutils-4.2</strong> NOT-OK (1999-10-29)<br />
+ Prints %2d, tm_year in shar.c, fixed in version 4.2.1</li>
+ <li><strong>smalltalk-1.1.5</strong> NOT-OK<br />
+ uses 31 bit signed int which overflows in 2004</li>
+ <li><strong>nethack-3.2.2</strong> NOT-OK (last update 19991217)<br />
+ writes records in %02d%02d%02d", lt->tm_year ... format</li>
+ <li><strong>tar-1.11.8</strong> NOT-OK (last update 20000118)<br />
+ The following will work OK:<br />
+ tar -czf dest.tgz --newer-mtime=Jan5,1999 sources<br />
+ The following will not work OK:<br />
+ tar -czf dest.tgz --newer-mtime=Jan5,2000 sources<br />
+ tar: Invalid date-format 'Jan5,2000'</li>
+ <li><strong>tiff-3.4b035</strong> NOT-OK<br />
+ Assumes 19xx years</li>
+ <li><strong>tiff-3.4b037</strong> NOT-OK<br />
+ Assumes 19xx years</li>
+ <li><strong>X11R6</strong> NOT-OK (last update 19991217)<br />
+ Did not pass Y2K tests
+<p>
xc/doc/specs/PEX5/SI/pex.macros
-
+</p><p>
Something here produces the year 19100. There is a patch which involves
some cryptic typing for me (receiving patches in Windhoos-mail and
-trying to get them past firewalls and things does not seem to work).
+trying to get them past firewalls and things does not seem to
+work).</p></li>
+
+</ul>
+
+<h3 id="NotChecked">GNU Software which has not yet been checked</h3>
-</UL>
-<P>
+<ul>
+ <li><strong>acm</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>automake-1.3</strong><br />
+ Newer version is tested OK</li>
+ <li><strong>cxref</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>dclshar</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>djgpp</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>dumb</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>elisp</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>emacs-19.29</strong><br />
+ Newer version is OK</li>
+ <li><strong>emacs-20.0</strong><br />
+ Newer version is OK</li>
+ <li><strong>emacs-lisp-intro</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>ffcall</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>fileutils-3.13</strong><br />
+ Newer version is probably OK </li>
+ <li><strong>flexfax</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>gamma</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>gas</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>gcc-vms</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>gdb-4.16</strong><br />
+ Too much date-like code for me to decide</li>
+ <li><strong>gdb-4.17</strong><br />
+ Too much date-like code for me to decide</li>
+ <li><strong>generic-NQS</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>geomview</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>ghostscript-4.03</strong><br />
+ Very obfuscated code, newer version is OK</li>
+ <li><strong>ghostview</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>gimp</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>gnat</strong><br />
+ Theoretically OK (There is a commercial claim)</li>
+ <li><strong>gnuserv</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>gpc</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>grep-2.2</strong><br />
+ Older version is OK</li>
+ <li><strong>groff-1.10</strong><br />
+ No suspect strings in source code, *roff family has Y2K
+problems, newer version 1.11 is NOT-OK!</li>
+ <li><strong>guavac</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>jarg400</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>jargon</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>karma</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>leim</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>lesstif</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>libg++-2.7.1</strong><br />
+ Newer version probably OK</li>
+ <li><strong>libg++-2.7.2</strong><br />
+ Newer version probably OK</li>
+ <li><strong>libg++-2.8.1.1a</strong><br />
+ Older version probably OK</li>
+ <li><strong>libstdc++-2.8.1</strong><br />
+ Older version probably OK</li>
+ <li><strong>lily</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>lout</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>lpf</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>makeinfo</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>mandelspawn</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>mkid</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>mkisofs</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>mule</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>mutt</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>nana</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>net2-bsd</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>netfax</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>nihcl</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>nvi</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>oaklisp</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>objective-c</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>obst</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>oops</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>p2c</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>pcl-gcl</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>perl-5.002</strong><br />
+ Newer version is claimed OK</li>
+ <li><strong>perl-5.003</strong><br />
+ Newer version is claimed OK</li>
+ <li><strong>perlref</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>phttpd</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>plotutils</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>prcs</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>rc</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>readline</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>recode</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>regex</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>rsync</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>rx</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>saoimage</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>scheme</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>scm</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>sh-utils-1.12</strong><br />
+ Newer version is tested OK</li>
+ <li><strong>sipp</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>smail</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>sneps</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>spell</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>spinner</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>superopt</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>swarm</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>termcap</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>termutils</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>tex</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>texinfo-3.7</strong><br />
+ Newer version is tested OK</li>
+ <li><strong>texinfo-3.9</strong><br />
+ Newer version is tested OK</li>
+ <li><strong>tile-forth</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>ucblogo</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>units</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>uucp</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>uuencode</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>vera</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>vm</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>w3</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>wdiff</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>wget-1.5.1</strong><br />
+ Newer version is tested as probably OK</li>
+ <li><strong>winboard</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>windows32api</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>wn</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>xboard-3.6.2</strong><br />
+ Newer version is tested OK</li>
+ <li><strong>xgrabsc</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>xxgdb</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>yale-T</strong></li>
+ <li><strong>ygl</strong></li>
+</ul>
+
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
-<H4><A HREF="year2000-list.html#TOCNotChecked"
- NAME="NotChecked">GNU Software which has not yet been checked</A></H4>
-<P>
-<UL>
- <LI><STRONG>acm</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>automake-1.3</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version is tested OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>cxref</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>dclshar</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>djgpp</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>dumb</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>elisp</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>emacs-19.29</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version is OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>emacs-20.0</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version is OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>emacs-lisp-intro</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>ffcall</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>fileutils-3.13</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version is probably OK <P>
- <LI><STRONG>flexfax</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>gamma</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>gas</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>gcc-vms</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>gdb-4.16</STRONG><BR>
- Too much date-like code for me to decide<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gdb-4.17</STRONG><BR>
- Too much date-like code for me to decide<P>
- <LI><STRONG>generic-NQS</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>geomview</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>ghostscript-4.03</STRONG><BR>
- Very obfuscated code, newer version is OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>ghostview</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>gimp</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>gnat</STRONG><BR>
- Theoretically OK (There is a commercial claim)<P>
- <LI><STRONG>gnuserv</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>gpc</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>grep-2.2</STRONG><BR>
- Older version is OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>groff-1.10</STRONG><BR>
- No suspect strings in source code, *roff family has Y2K problems, newer
version 1.11 is NOT-OK!<P>
- <LI><STRONG>guavac</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>jarg400</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>jargon</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>karma</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>leim</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>lesstif</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>libg++-2.7.1</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version probably OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>libg++-2.7.2</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version probably OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>libg++-2.8.1.1a</STRONG><BR>
- Older version probably OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>libstdc++-2.8.1</STRONG><BR>
- Older version probably OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>lily</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>lout</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>lpf</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>makeinfo</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>mandelspawn</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>mkid</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>mkisofs</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>mule</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>mutt</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>nana</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>net2-bsd</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>netfax</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>nihcl</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>nvi</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>oaklisp</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>objective-c</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>obst</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>oops</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>p2c</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>pcl-gcl</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>perl-5.002</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version is claimed OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>perl-5.003</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version is claimed OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>perlref</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>phttpd</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>plotutils</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>prcs</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>rc</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>readline</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>recode</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>regex</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>rsync</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>rx</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>saoimage</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>scheme</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>scm</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>sh-utils-1.12</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version is tested OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>sipp</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>smail</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>sneps</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>spell</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>spinner</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>superopt</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>swarm</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>termcap</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>termutils</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>tex</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>texinfo-3.7</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version is tested OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>texinfo-3.9</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version is tested OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>tile-forth</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>ucblogo</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>units</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>uucp</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>uuencode</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>vera</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>vm</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>w3</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>wdiff</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>wget-1.5.1</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version is tested as probably OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>winboard</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>windows32api</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>wn</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>xboard-3.6.2</STRONG><BR>
- Newer version is tested OK<P>
- <LI><STRONG>xgrabsc</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>xxgdb</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>yale-T</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
- <LI><STRONG>ygl</STRONG><BR>
- <P>
-</UL>
-<P>
-<HR>
-
-Return to <A HREF="/home.html">GNU's home page</A>.
-<P>
-
-Please send FSF & GNU inquiries & questions to
-
-<A HREF="mailto:address@hidden";><EM>address@hidden</EM></A>.
-There are also <A HREF="/home.html#ContactInfo">other ways to
-contact</A> the FSF.
-<P>
-
-Please send comments on these web pages to
-
-<A HREF="mailto:address@hidden";><EM>address@hidden</EM></A>,
-send other questions to
-<A HREF="mailto:address@hidden";><EM>address@hidden</EM></A>.
-<P>Copyright (C) 1997, 1998, 1999, 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<P>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<p>Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999, 2011, 2013 Free Software
+Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
-</P>
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2011/10/24 19:35:05 $
+$Date: 2013/01/28 05:24:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
-
-</BODY>
-</HTML>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www distros/screenshot.html software/year2000.h...,
Pavel Kharitonov <=