[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug: malloc + function returning double + comparison
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bug: malloc + function returning double + comparison between doubles
Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:09:58 +0200
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-2-amd64; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; )
Le dimanche 10 juin 2012 12:09:37, Daniel Glöckner a écrit :
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 09:15:52AM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> > Thomas: as you were last fiddling with arm, you might want to check
> > if the test works on it. The other alloca testcase is #ifdef'ed on
> > i386 and x86_64, but that only makes sense if alloca really isn't
> > supported on arm, which I can't believe. If that really is the case
> > callsave_test() needs to be conditional too.
> Some time ago I posted an alloca version for ARM:
> but we don't build a libtcc1 for ARM and libgcc/libc don't provide
> alloca as it is a GCC builtin.
Should a libtcc1 be built on ARM then? If not, I guess a define on ARM would
do it but it would not be clean.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.