[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## [Texmacs-dev] Improvements in LaTeX -> TeXmacs conversion

**From**: |
Joris van der Hoeven |

**Subject**: |
[Texmacs-dev] Improvements in LaTeX -> TeXmacs conversion |

**Date**: |
Thu, 9 May 2002 23:34:25 +0200 (MET DST) |

Hi,
I hacked a bit the LaTeX -> TeXmacs converter
in order to get presentable versions of Alvaro's texts.
In TeXmacs 1.0.0.5 this should work reasonably well,
even though a complete rewriting of the filter
remains necessary.
I also found many things in the texts which are
semantically incorrect (from the typesetting point of view).
For instance, you often type formulas like
\( \Bbb R^2 \)
This means that the exponent 2 is also in blackboard bold!
Of course, it should not be surprising that formulas of
this kind are not converted in the right way.
In a similar way, the text "pertenece" in
\( Sl(n;R)=\left\{ A\, pertenece\, Gl(n;R)/\det A=+1\right\} \)
will be interpreted as a formula p*e*r*t*e*n*e*c*e*.
Another thing which is quite ugly is the systematic use
of descriptions for entering theorems, definitions,
proofs and so on; of course, you should use the appropriate
environments for these, and possibly write a corresponding
style file.
What does "puta mierda" mean? It is a recurrent theme in your texts.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>
http://www.texmacs.org: GNU TeXmacs scientific text editor
http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~vdhoeven: personal homepage
-----------------------------------------------------------

[Prev in Thread] |
**Current Thread** |
[Next in Thread] |

**[Texmacs-dev] Improvements in LaTeX -> TeXmacs conversion**,
*Joris van der Hoeven* **<=**