Re: missing node next using sectioning commands

[Karl Berry]

     @node First node,,Top,Top
     @chapter first node chapter

     @node Second node,Third node unnumbered,,Top
     @chapter second node chapter

    leads to Second node being node-Next for First node in tp (and not in
    texi2html).  Is it right?

And First node being node-Prev for Second node?

My gut reaction is to say no.  If explicit pointers are provided, they
should be used, and thus an empty value means that pointer is "null".
Isn't that what (C)makeinfo does?  (Sorry, can't easily check right now.)

k