Re: missing node next using sectioning commands

[Patrice Dumas]

On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:24:22PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
> 
> My gut reaction is to say no.  If explicit pointers are provided, they
> should be used, and thus an empty value means that pointer is "null".
> Isn't that what (C)makeinfo does?  (Sorry, can't easily check right now.)

I'd say this is what (C)makeinfo does, even though I didn't check since
it is also what texi2html does and it was pretty compatible with (C)makeinfo
in those cases.

In any case, not adding pointers when there are explicit pointers is also 
what seems correct to me.

-- 
Pat