[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Taler] gnurl cygwin, windows, buildsystem fix?

From: ng0
Subject: Re: [Taler] gnurl cygwin, windows, buildsystem fix?
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 20:38:47 +0000


Florian Dold transcribed 1.0K bytes:
> What about Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL)?
> I'm not sure if it's worth to invest time in getting things to work with
> cygwin, when WSL might just eradicate the need for all that effort.
> For GNU Taler, we don't really have a need to run on Windows in the
> first place.

There's a couple of other platforms in there in addition to windows,
but I guess where Taler uses gnurl or curl it is about the backend.
> So maybe the GNUnet mailing list would be a better place to ask!


> - Florian
> On 5/22/19 7:34 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > as I'm still stuck a bit longer with maintaining gnurl, and I now
> > am looking into cygwin and later native windows builds, is there
> > a reasonable interest in having functional (x86_64) cygwin and Windows
> > builds? In all those years I never tested the build.
> > 
> > I can't for the next couple of months. But people complain about
> > gnunet and cygwin, and how cygwin was/is the defacto build for
> > gnunet for a number of reasons.. so anything against or for
> > fixing this up starting at the lower bottom (gnurl)?
> > 
> > cygwin would be easy, native would probably involve some more
> > reasoning about requirements of our various projects.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > ng0
> > 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]