[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scheduling
From: |
John W. Fondon III (Trey) |
Subject: |
Re: Scheduling |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Nov 1997 08:19:53 -0600 |
>On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Thai Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Dear fellow Swarm users:
>>
>> I need help on Swarm's schedule:
>>
>> 1. In the application Heatbugs, what will happen if there are two bugs
>> at (2,4) and (2,5) and both bugs pick out (2,3) as the next best spot to
>> move to? Will only one of the bug moves to this spot? If so, will this
>> be determined by which bug was first (or last) added to the bugList?
>
>>From the Heatbug.m file:
>
> // Part of the heatbug simulation is that two bugs cannot be in the
> // same spot. The code to enforce that is done here: if the site we
> // want is occupied by another heatbug, move randomly. Note that
> // this code does not parallelize properly, it requires that each
> // bug be set a "step" method in sequence. This is a design flaw in
> // heatbugs: proper conflict resolution is difficult.
> // Also note we only look for 10 random spots - if we don't find an
> // unoccupied spot by then, assume it's too crowded and just don't move.
>
What is "the proper conflict resolution"? Is there a way to do this sshort
of resorting to spin glasses?
Trey
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
==================================
- Scheduling, Thai Dinh Nguyen, 1997/11/19
- Re: Scheduling,
John W. Fondon III (Trey) <=
- Re: Scheduling, Sven N. Thommesen, 1997/11/21