[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gcc Compile
From: |
Nelson Minar |
Subject: |
Re: gcc Compile |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Feb 96 12:49:53 MST |
>1.) I was told by my system manager that gcc needs
> a resident C compiler to install itself. Is this
> true? Specifically, I installed Sun OS2.4 on my PC but
> it doesn't come with a generic compiler. Purchasing
> one is a costly proposal.
ARGH! Thank you, Sun, for shipping a Unix system without a compiler.
I know someone, somewhere has a binary-only distribution of gcc: this
should be enough to at least bootstrap you to building your own
compiler. I'd check the comp.sys.sun FAQ, and
ftp://prep.ai.mit.gnu/pub/gnu/ first. There's probably a Solaris ftp
archive somewhere that could help.
>2.) Are the SWARM executables transferable to machines
> that don't have all on the libraries installed or
> does the executable code need access to them at run time.
It depends on how you link them. If you add the flag "-static" to the
link line, gcc will statically link in everything and you have a
standalone binary. If the shared libraries you use are standard
enough, you can also try to transport the shared version and hope the
other machine has them.
- gcc Compile, Doug Donalson, 1996/02/01
- Re: gcc Compile,
Nelson Minar <=