[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] Watchdog code
From: |
John Li |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] Watchdog code |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:53:02 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:29:38PM +0200, Julian Stecklina wrote:
> Vitaly Mayatskikh <address@hidden> writes:
> > At Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:21:37 +0200, Julian Stecklina wrote:
> >
> >> I am currently rewriting run-program to not do that anymore. I hope this
> >> fixes the last long standing issue with SBCL as stumpwm host.
> >
> > Are you going just to drop wait3 or to use other tracing facility
> > (like ptrace)?
>
> The idea is to make the whole thing race-free with respect to
> signals. wait3/waitpid has to stay, since otherwise you raise an army of
> zombie processes. :)
StumpWM -- Raising an army. A zombie army.
<3
- [STUMP] Watchdog code, Fredrik Tolf, 2008/10/20
- Re: [STUMP] Watchdog code, Fredrik Tolf, 2008/10/20
- Re: [STUMP] Watchdog code, Vitaly Mayatskikh, 2008/10/21
- Re: [STUMP] Watchdog code, Julian Stecklina, 2008/10/21
- Re: [STUMP] Watchdog code, Vitaly Mayatskikh, 2008/10/21
- Re: [STUMP] Watchdog code, Julian Stecklina, 2008/10/21
- Re: [STUMP] Watchdog code,
John Li <=
- [STUMP] time.lisp, ivy . foster, 2008/10/21
- Re: [STUMP] time.lisp, Shawn, 2008/10/22
- Re: [STUMP] time.lisp, ivy . foster, 2008/10/22
- Re: [STUMP] time.lisp, Shawn, 2008/10/22