Re: [Sks-devel] The pool is shrinking

[Stefan Claas]

Andrew Gallagher wrote:

> 
> > On 16 Aug 2019, at 19:48, Stefan Claas <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > People, like me, do not
> > like the idea of sharing dumps to 3rd parties (hello GDPR), without our
> > consent.
> 
> There is no net difference between distributing a dump and peering with
> another sks server. I don’t understand why you keep going on about dumps and
> not peering. They are the same thing from a data protection POV. 

O.k. I understand your point, but what I like to say is that I or anybody
else can download a dump without running a key server. While running a
key server requires a dump, it would be really nice if dumps are only
available to a (trusted) pool of operators, as long as the current SKS
model is still available on the Internet.

Regards
Stefan

-- 
box: 4a64758de9e8ceded2c481ee526440687fe2f3a828e3a813f87753ad30847b56
GPG: C93E252DFB3B4DB7EAEB846AD8D464B35E12AB77 (avail. on Hagrid, WKD)