[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-register-public] [task #8406] Submission of MplayerGS
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-register-public] [task #8406] Submission of MplayerGS |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Aug 2008 20:36:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 07:09:35PM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> >
> > > I'll post the proforma reply here for your approval.
> >
> > Please do.
>
> First, the main issue -- we do not recommend MPlayer, because at least
> in the past it used to include some non-free codecs. AFAICT, judging
> by the Debian mplayer package, the only parts which are removed are
> mencoder and dvdcss, which are free software but there are patent
> concerns. There are still binary codecs available to download from
> their website, which is enough reason not to recommend it.
>
> I'm not sure if this rules out MPlayer as dependency.
I don't think so.
- patents: usually we don't (well, can't :)) check them unless there's
a specific action from the FSF (e.g. gifs a couple years ago) and
when they concern the hosted source code (rather than dependencise)
- DMCA (DeCSS): essentially the same
- dependency recommends proprietary software: that's sad, but mplayer
isn't an isolated case. The main point is that the project can be
used in a 100% free OS.
> Provided that MPlayer is not a problem, here is the response I intend
> to send:
>
> * * *
>
> I am reviewing your project -- sorry for the delay.
> There are some inconsistencies:
>
> * Please remove all statements "All rights reserved." -- they are
> incompatible with the GPL and in general contradict with any free
> software license.
That would be nice, though I checked with address@hidden the other
day, and as long as there is also a GPL standard notice, "all rights
reserved" is not a problem. So this isn't mandatory.
> * The preferred copyright notice for GPLv3 has changed slightly --
> please see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html or the file
> COPYING in your tarball.
> * Please include a short README with a copyright notice in Resources
> for the images and the .gorm files. See
> http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Notices.html
> for details. (BTW, some of the images are executable -- perhaps a
> mistake.)
> * In MplayerGSInfo.plist the copyright year is 2003; since this is
> what the users will see in the Info dialog, please include all
> years as appropriate, separated by commas. See the above URL for
> details.
>
> Would you be willing to correct these small problems and give us the
> URL to an updated tarball?
>
> Thanks.
>
> P.S. Unrelated to the project registration, but I find it worth
> mentioning. Your package does not work on gNewSense 2.0 -- it builds
> fine but NSException is thrown when loading the .gorms. IIRC this is
> because they were edited with a modern version of Gorm which depends
> on GNUstep GUI 0.14. You might want to include (in README, for
> example) the minimal Base/GUI versions required; this would be very
> helpful to your users.
The rest looks good :)
--
Sylvain