[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[task #15699] Unified format for software tarballs
From: |
Antonio Diaz Diaz |
Subject: |
[task #15699] Unified format for software tarballs |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Oct 2021 14:16:24 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40 |
Follow-up Comment #5, task #15699 (project reproduce):
> Good point! You mean to use the '--best' (or '-9') option when calling lzip,
right?
Yes, but '--best' is kind of deprecated; it exists mostly for backward
compatibility with gzip, and is not the best lzip can do.
I suggest to use 'lzip -9', which is, for example, what automake uses.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?15699>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [task #15699] Unified format for software source code archival, Mohammad Akhlaghi, 2021/10/03
- [task #15699] Unified format for software tarballs, Mohammad Akhlaghi, 2021/10/04
- [task #15699] Unified format for software tarballs, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2021/10/04
- [task #15699] Unified format for software tarballs, Mohammad Akhlaghi, 2021/10/04
- [task #15699] Unified format for software tarballs,
Antonio Diaz Diaz <=
- [task #15699] Unified format for software tarballs, Mohammad Akhlaghi, 2021/10/05
- [task #15699] Unified format for software tarballs, Antonio Diaz Diaz, 2021/10/05
- [task #15699] Unified format for software tarballs, Mohammad Akhlaghi, 2021/10/06
- [task #15699] Unified format for software tarballs, Mohammad Akhlaghi, 2021/10/31