[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64
From: |
Guo Ren |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64 |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:15:28 +0800 |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 4:51 PM Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:16 PM Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:32 AM Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:47 AM Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
> > > >
> > > > Highest bits of PTE has been used for svpbmt, ref: [1], [2], so we
> > > > need to ignore them. They cannot be a part of ppn.
> > > >
> > > > 1: The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, Volume II: Privileged Architecture
> > > > 4.4 Sv39: Page-Based 39-bit Virtual-Memory System
> > > > 4.5 Sv48: Page-Based 48-bit Virtual-Memory System
> > > >
> > > > 2:
> > > > https://github.com/riscv/virtual-memory/blob/main/specs/663-Svpbmt-diff.pdf
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
> > > > Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@c-sky.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 7 +++++++
> > > > target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 2 +-
> > > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > > > index 5a6d49aa64..282cd8eecd 100644
> > > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > > > @@ -490,6 +490,13 @@ typedef enum {
> > > > /* Page table PPN shift amount */
> > > > #define PTE_PPN_SHIFT 10
> > > >
> > > > +/* Page table PPN mask */
> > > > +#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
> > > > +#define PTE_PPN_MASK 0xffffffffUL
> > > > +#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
> > > > +#define PTE_PPN_MASK 0x3fffffffffffffULL
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Going forward we should avoid using target specific "#if"
> > > so that we can use the same qemu-system-riscv64 for both
> > > RV32 and RV64.
> > >
> > > > /* Leaf page shift amount */
> > > > #define PGSHIFT 12
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > > > index 434a83e66a..26608ddf1c 100644
> > > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > > > @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ restart:
> > > > return TRANSLATE_FAIL;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - hwaddr ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> > > > + hwaddr ppn = (pte & PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> > >
> > > Rather than using "#if", please use "xlen" comparison to extract
> > > PPN correctly from PTE.
> > Do you mean?
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > index 9fffaccffb..071b7ea4cf 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > @@ -619,7 +619,11 @@ restart:
> > return TRANSLATE_FAIL;
> > }
> >
> > - hwaddr ppn = (pte & PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> > + if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) {
> > + hwaddr ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> > + } else {
> > + hwaddr ppn = (pte & 0x3fffffffffffffULL) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
> > + }
>
> Yes, something like this but use a define for 0x3fffffffffffffULL
Just as Alistair said: This will need to be dynamic based on get_xl()
I still prefer:
+#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
+#define PTE_PPN_MASK 0xffffffffUL
+#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
+#define PTE_PPN_MASK 0x3fffffffffffffULL
+#endif
+ hwaddr ppn = (pte & PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
>
> Regards,
> Anup
>
> >
> > RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> > if (!(pte & PTE_V)) {
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Anup
> > >
> > > >
> > > > if (!(pte & PTE_V)) {
> > > > /* Invalid PTE */
> > > > --
> > > > 2.17.1
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Guo Ren
> >
> > ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
> >
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
- [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, (continued)
- [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Weiwei Li, 2022/01/17
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Anup Patel, 2022/01/17
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Alistair Francis, 2022/01/17
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Guo Ren, 2022/01/18
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Guo Ren, 2022/01/20
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, LIU Zhiwei, 2022/01/20
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Guo Ren, 2022/01/20
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, LIU Zhiwei, 2022/01/20
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Guo Ren, 2022/01/18
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Anup Patel, 2022/01/18
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64,
Guo Ren <=
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Anup Patel, 2022/01/18
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Anup Patel, 2022/01/18
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Guo Ren, 2022/01/18
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, Weiwei Li, 2022/01/18
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] target/riscv: Ignore reserved bits in PTE for RV64, LIU Zhiwei, 2022/01/18
[PATCH v5 3/5] target/riscv: add support for svnapot extension, Weiwei Li, 2022/01/17
[PATCH v5 2/5] target/riscv: add PTE_A/PTE_D/PTE_U bits check for inner PTE, Weiwei Li, 2022/01/17
[PATCH v5 5/5] target/riscv: add support for svpbmt extension, Weiwei Li, 2022/01/17