[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 17/36] spapr: add device tree support for the X
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 17/36] spapr: add device tree support for the XIVE exploitation mode |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Nov 2018 15:31:55 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 11:57:10AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> The XIVE interface for the guest is described in the device tree under
> the "interrupt-controller" node. A couple of new properties are
> specific to XIVE :
>
> - "reg"
>
> contains the base address and size of the thread interrupt
> managnement areas (TIMA), for the User level and for the Guest OS
> level. Only the Guest OS level is taken into account today.
>
> - "ibm,xive-eq-sizes"
>
> the size of the event queues. One cell per size supported, contains
> log2 of size, in ascending order.
>
> - "ibm,xive-lisn-ranges"
>
> the IRQ interrupt number ranges assigned to the guest for the IPIs.
>
> and also under the root node :
>
> - "ibm,plat-res-int-priorities"
>
> contains a list of priorities that the hypervisor has reserved for
> its own use. OPAL uses the priority 7 queue to automatically
> escalate interrupts for all other queues (DD2.X POWER9). So only
> priorities [0..6] are allowed for the guest.
>
> Extend the sPAPR IRQ backend with a new handler to populate the DT
> with the appropriate "interrupt-controller" node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> ---
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h | 2 ++
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h | 2 ++
> hw/intc/spapr_xive_hcall.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 3 +-
> hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 17 ++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> index c854ae527808..cfdc1f86e713 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ typedef struct sPAPRIrq {
> void (*free)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq, int num);
> qemu_irq (*qirq)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, int irq);
> void (*print_info)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, Monitor *mon);
> + void (*dt_populate)(sPAPRMachineState *spapr, uint32_t nr_servers,
> + void *fdt, uint32_t phandle);
> } sPAPRIrq;
>
> extern sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_xics;
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h
> index 418511f3dc10..5b3fab192d41 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_xive.h
> @@ -65,5 +65,7 @@ bool spapr_xive_priority_is_valid(uint8_t priority);
> typedef struct sPAPRMachineState sPAPRMachineState;
>
> void spapr_xive_hcall_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr);
> +void spapr_dt_xive(sPAPRXive *xive, int nr_servers, void *fdt,
> + uint32_t phandle);
>
> #endif /* PPC_SPAPR_XIVE_H */
> diff --git a/hw/intc/spapr_xive_hcall.c b/hw/intc/spapr_xive_hcall.c
> index 52e4e23995f5..66c78aa88500 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/spapr_xive_hcall.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/spapr_xive_hcall.c
> @@ -890,3 +890,65 @@ void spapr_xive_hcall_init(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
> spapr_register_hypercall(H_INT_SYNC, h_int_sync);
> spapr_register_hypercall(H_INT_RESET, h_int_reset);
> }
> +
> +void spapr_dt_xive(sPAPRXive *xive, int nr_servers, void *fdt, uint32_t
> phandle)
> +{
> + int node;
> + uint64_t timas[2 * 2];
> + /* Interrupt number ranges for the IPIs */
> + uint32_t lisn_ranges[] = {
> + cpu_to_be32(0),
> + cpu_to_be32(nr_servers),
> + };
> + uint32_t eq_sizes[] = {
> + cpu_to_be32(12), /* 4K */
> + cpu_to_be32(16), /* 64K */
> + cpu_to_be32(21), /* 2M */
> + cpu_to_be32(24), /* 16M */
> + };
> + /* The following array is in sync with the 'spapr_xive_priority_is_valid'
> + * routine above. The O/S is expected to choose priority 6.
> + */
> + uint32_t plat_res_int_priorities[] = {
> + cpu_to_be32(7), /* start */
> + cpu_to_be32(0xf8), /* count */
> + };
> + gchar *nodename;
> +
> + /* Thread Interrupt Management Area : User (ring 3) and OS (ring 2) */
> + timas[0] = cpu_to_be64(xive->tm_base + 3 * (1ull << TM_SHIFT));
> + timas[1] = cpu_to_be64(1ull << TM_SHIFT);
> + timas[2] = cpu_to_be64(xive->tm_base + 2 * (1ull << TM_SHIFT));
Don't you have symbolic constants for the ring numbers, instead of '2'
and '3' above?
> + timas[3] = cpu_to_be64(1ull << TM_SHIFT);
> +
> + nodename = g_strdup_printf("address@hidden" PRIx64,
> + xive->tm_base + 3 * (1 << TM_SHIFT));
> + _FDT(node = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, 0, nodename));
> + g_free(nodename);
> +
> + _FDT(fdt_setprop_string(fdt, node, "device_type", "power-ivpe"));
> + _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "reg", timas, sizeof(timas)));
> +
> + _FDT(fdt_setprop_string(fdt, node, "compatible", "ibm,power-ivpe"));
> + _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "ibm,xive-eq-sizes", eq_sizes,
> + sizeof(eq_sizes)));
> + _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "ibm,xive-lisn-ranges", lisn_ranges,
> + sizeof(lisn_ranges)));
> +
> + /* For Linux to link the LSIs to the main interrupt controller.
What's the "main interrupt controller" in this context?
> + * These properties are not in XIVE exploitation mode sPAPR
> + * specs
> + */
> + _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "interrupt-controller", NULL, 0));
> + _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, node, "#interrupt-cells", 2));
> +
> + /* For SLOF */
> + _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, node, "linux,phandle", phandle));
> + _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, node, "phandle", phandle));
> +
> + /* The "ibm,plat-res-int-priorities" property defines the priority
> + * ranges reserved by the hypervisor
> + */
> + _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, 0, "ibm,plat-res-int-priorities",
> + plat_res_int_priorities,
> sizeof(plat_res_int_priorities)));
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index 9f8c19e56e7a..ad1692cdcd0f 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -1270,7 +1270,8 @@ static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, 0, "#size-cells", 2));
>
> /* /interrupt controller */
> - spapr_dt_xics(xics_max_server_number(spapr), fdt, PHANDLE_XICP);
> + smc->irq->dt_populate(spapr, xics_max_server_number(spapr), fdt,
> + PHANDLE_XICP);
>
> ret = spapr_populate_memory(spapr, fdt);
> if (ret < 0) {
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> index da6fcfaa3c52..d88a029d8c5c 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> @@ -190,6 +190,13 @@ static void spapr_irq_print_info_xics(sPAPRMachineState
> *spapr, Monitor *mon)
> ics_pic_print_info(spapr->ics, mon);
> }
>
> +static void spapr_irq_dt_populate_xics(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> + uint32_t nr_servers, void *fdt,
> + uint32_t phandle)
> +{
> + spapr_dt_xics(nr_servers, fdt, phandle);
> +}
> +
It'd be nicer to change the signature of spapr_dt_xics, rather than
having this one line wrapper.
> #define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS 0x1000
> #define SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_MSIS \
> (XICS_IRQ_BASE + SPAPR_IRQ_XICS_NR_IRQS - SPAPR_IRQ_MSI)
> @@ -203,6 +210,7 @@ sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_xics = {
> .free = spapr_irq_free_xics,
> .qirq = spapr_qirq_xics,
> .print_info = spapr_irq_print_info_xics,
> + .dt_populate = spapr_irq_dt_populate_xics,
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -300,6 +308,13 @@ static void spapr_irq_print_info_xive(sPAPRMachineState
> *spapr,
> spapr_xive_pic_print_info(spapr->xive, mon);
> }
>
> +static void spapr_irq_dt_populate_xive(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> + uint32_t nr_servers, void *fdt,
> + uint32_t phandle)
> +{
> + spapr_dt_xive(spapr->xive, nr_servers, fdt, phandle);
Uh.. and to make the hook signature just match what we need rather
than having to have trivial wrappers in both cases.
> +}
> +
> /*
> * XIVE uses the full IRQ number space. Set it to 8K to be compatible
> * with XICS.
> @@ -317,6 +332,7 @@ sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_xive = {
> .free = spapr_irq_free_xive,
> .qirq = spapr_qirq_xive,
> .print_info = spapr_irq_print_info_xive,
> + .dt_populate = spapr_irq_dt_populate_xive,
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -421,4 +437,5 @@ sPAPRIrq spapr_irq_xics_legacy = {
> .free = spapr_irq_free_xics,
> .qirq = spapr_qirq_xics,
> .print_info = spapr_irq_print_info_xics,
> + .dt_populate = spapr_irq_dt_populate_xics,
> };
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 15/36] spapr: introdude a new machine IRQ backend for XIVE, (continued)
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 16/36] spapr: add hcalls support for the XIVE exploitation interrupt mode, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/11/16
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 16/36] spapr: add hcalls support for the XIVE exploitation interrupt mode, David Gibson, 2018/11/27
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 16/36] spapr: add hcalls support for the XIVE exploitation interrupt mode, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/11/28
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 16/36] spapr: add hcalls support for the XIVE exploitation interrupt mode, David Gibson, 2018/11/28
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 16/36] spapr: add hcalls support for the XIVE exploitation interrupt mode, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 16/36] spapr: add hcalls support for the XIVE exploitation interrupt mode, David Gibson, 2018/11/29
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 16/36] spapr: add hcalls support for the XIVE exploitation interrupt mode, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/11/30
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 17/36] spapr: add device tree support for the XIVE exploitation mode, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/11/16
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 17/36] spapr: add device tree support for the XIVE exploitation mode,
David Gibson <=
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 18/36] spapr: allocate the interrupt thread context under the CPU core, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/11/16
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 19/36] spapr: add a 'pseries-3.1-xive' machine type, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/11/16
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v5 20/36] spapr: add classes for the XIVE models, Cédric Le Goater, 2018/11/16