Re: [Qemu-ppc] [RFC for-2.13 02/12] target/ppc: Simplify cpu valid check in ppc_cpu_realize

[Thomas Huth]

On 27.03.2018 06:37, David Gibson wrote:
> The #if isn't necessary, because there's a suitable one inside
> ppc_cpu_is_valid().  We've already filtered for suitable cpu models in the
> functions that search and register them.  So by the time we get to realize
> having an invalid one indicates a code error, not a user error, so an
> assert() is more appropriate than error_setg().
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/ppc/translate_init.c | 9 +--------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate_init.c b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> index 56b80a204a..2ae718242a 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> @@ -9749,14 +9749,7 @@ static void ppc_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
> **errp)
>          }
>      }
>  
> -#if defined(TARGET_PPCEMB)
> -    if (!ppc_cpu_is_valid(pcc)) {
> -        error_setg(errp, "CPU does not possess a BookE or 4xx MMU. "
> -                   "Please use qemu-system-ppc or qemu-system-ppc64 instead "
> -                   "or choose another CPU model.");
> -        goto unrealize;
> -    }
> -#endif
> +    assert(ppc_cpu_is_valid(pcc));
>  
>      create_ppc_opcodes(cpu, &local_err);
>      if (local_err != NULL) {
> 

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>