[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-ppc] [RFC for-2.13 02/12] target/ppc: Simplify cpu valid check in
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
[Qemu-ppc] [RFC for-2.13 02/12] target/ppc: Simplify cpu valid check in ppc_cpu_realize |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:37:31 +1100 |
The #if isn't necessary, because there's a suitable one inside
ppc_cpu_is_valid(). We've already filtered for suitable cpu models in the
functions that search and register them. So by the time we get to realize
having an invalid one indicates a code error, not a user error, so an
assert() is more appropriate than error_setg().
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
---
target/ppc/translate_init.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/ppc/translate_init.c b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
index 56b80a204a..2ae718242a 100644
--- a/target/ppc/translate_init.c
+++ b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
@@ -9749,14 +9749,7 @@ static void ppc_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
**errp)
}
}
-#if defined(TARGET_PPCEMB)
- if (!ppc_cpu_is_valid(pcc)) {
- error_setg(errp, "CPU does not possess a BookE or 4xx MMU. "
- "Please use qemu-system-ppc or qemu-system-ppc64 instead "
- "or choose another CPU model.");
- goto unrealize;
- }
-#endif
+ assert(ppc_cpu_is_valid(pcc));
create_ppc_opcodes(cpu, &local_err);
if (local_err != NULL) {
--
2.14.3