qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 17/18] docs/devel: mention the spacing requirement for QOM


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] docs/devel: mention the spacing requirement for QOM
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 09:48:48 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0

On 24/04/2023 10:22, Alex Bennée wrote:

We have a more complete document on QOM but we should at least mention
the style requirements in the style guide.

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20230420155723.1711048-9-alex.bennee@linaro.org>

---
vppr:
   - use Mark's formulation, briefly mention property separation.
---
  docs/devel/qom.rst   |  2 ++
  docs/devel/style.rst | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/devel/qom.rst b/docs/devel/qom.rst
index 3e34b07c98..c9237950d0 100644
--- a/docs/devel/qom.rst
+++ b/docs/devel/qom.rst
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+.. _qom:
+
  ===========================
  The QEMU Object Model (QOM)
  ===========================
diff --git a/docs/devel/style.rst b/docs/devel/style.rst
index 5bc6f2f095..e9fce0fc69 100644
--- a/docs/devel/style.rst
+++ b/docs/devel/style.rst
@@ -628,6 +628,46 @@ are still some caveats to beware of
  QEMU Specific Idioms
  ********************
+QEMU Object Model Declarations
+==============================
+
+QEMU Object Model Declarations
+==============================

Accidental repetition here :)

+The QEMU Object Model (QOM) provides a framework for handling objects
+in the base C language. The first declaration of a storage or class
+structure should always be the parent and leave a visual space between
+that declaration and the new code. It is also useful to separate
+backing for properties (options driven by the user) and internal state
+to make navigation easier.
+
+For a storage structure the first declaration should always be called
+"parent_obj" and for a class structure the first member should always
+be called "parent_class" as below:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+    struct MyDeviceState {
+        DeviceState parent_obj;
+
+        /* Properties */
+        int prop_a;
+        char *prop_b;
+        /* Other stuff */
+        int internal_state;
+    };
+
+    struct MyDeviceClass {
+        DeviceClass parent_class;
+
+        void (*new_fn1)(void);
+        bool (*new_fn2)(CPUState *);
+    };
+
+Note that there is no need to provide typedefs for QOM structures
+since these are generated automatically by the QOM declaration macros.
+See :ref:`qom` for more details.
+
  Error handling and reporting
  ============================

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>


ATB,

Mark.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]