qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 00/59] Fifth RISC-V PR for QEMU 8.0


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PULL 00/59] Fifth RISC-V PR for QEMU 8.0
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 13:35:27 +0000

On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 08:41, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> merged tag 'buildsys-qom-qdev-ui-20230227'
> The following changes since commit 627634031092e1514f363fd8659a579398de0f0e:
>
>   Merge tag 'buildsys-qom-qdev-ui-20230227' of https://github.com/philmd/qemu 
> into staging (2023-02-28 15:09:18 +0000)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
>   https://gitlab.com/palmer-dabbelt/qemu.git tags/pull-riscv-to-apply-20230303
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 37151032989ecf6e7ce8b65bc7bcb400d0318b2c:
>
>   Merge patch series "target/riscv: some vector_helper.c cleanups" 
> (2023-03-01 18:09:48 -0800)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Fifth RISC-V PR for QEMU 8.0
>
> * Experimantal support for writable misa.
> * Support for Svadu extension.
> * Support for the Zicond extension.
> * Fixes to gdbstub, CSR accesses, dependencies between the various
>   floating-point exceptions, and XTheadMemPair.
> * Many cleanups.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> There's a lot of cleanups here, a handful of which ended up stepping on
> each other and were necessary for various features.  I tried to keep
> each individual patch set intact, but that led to some merge conflicts
> and a bit of a clunky history -- I'm not sure what the right answer is
> there, happy to re-spin this to be more linear if that's problem for
> folks.
>
> Unfortunately the OpenSBI bump is still failing CI, it turns out I
> missed the second stage.  I was intending on having a sixth PR anyway as
> I'd really like to get the ACPI patches in for 8.0 so we can start
> testing everywhere else.  There's also a patch set from Daniel that's
> ready to go but depends on some recently merged TCG patches, so I
> figured it'd be better to just send what's ready now rather than trying
> to make the history more complicated.
>
> This all passes my local tests ("make check" and a bunch of Linux
> configs), but "push-ci-now" is still tripping up on OpenSBI as that's
> due to some network resources changing.  With any luck I'll have some
> time to sort things out this weekend (though always happy to have some
> help if anyone wants to throw in some time).
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------


Applied, thanks.

Please update the changelog at https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/8.0
for any user-visible changes.

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]