qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] virtio-pci: submit msi route changes in batch


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] virtio-pci: submit msi route changes in batch
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 05:17:14 -0500

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 05:39:35PM +0800, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> From: Longpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com>
> 
> The kvm_irqchip_commit_routes() is a time-intensive operation, it needs
> scan and update all irqfds that are already assigned during each invocation,
> so more vectors means need more time to process them.

I think the real reason is it's the write side of RCU.

> For virtio-pci, we
> can just submit once when enabling vectors of a virtio-pci device.
> 
> This can reduce the downtime when migrating a VM with vhost-vdpa devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Longpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com>
> ---
>  hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> index 247325c193..22e76e3902 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,19 @@
>   * configuration space */
>  #define VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_SIZE(dev)     
> VIRTIO_PCI_CONFIG_OFF(msix_enabled(dev))
>  
> +/* Protected by the BQL */
> +static KVMRouteChange virtio_pci_route_change;
> +
> +static inline void virtio_pci_begin_route_changes(void)
> +{
> +    virtio_pci_route_change = kvm_irqchip_begin_route_changes(kvm_state);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void virtio_pci_commit_route_changes(void)
> +{
> +    kvm_irqchip_commit_route_changes(&virtio_pci_route_change);
> +}
> +
>  static void virtio_pci_bus_new(VirtioBusState *bus, size_t bus_size,
>                                 VirtIOPCIProxy *dev);
>  static void virtio_pci_reset(DeviceState *qdev);
> @@ -790,12 +803,11 @@ static int kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_use(VirtIOPCIProxy 
> *proxy,
>      int ret;
>  
>      if (irqfd->users == 0) {
> -        KVMRouteChange c = kvm_irqchip_begin_route_changes(kvm_state);
> -        ret = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(&c, vector, &proxy->pci_dev);
> +        ret = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(&virtio_pci_route_change, vector,
> +                                        &proxy->pci_dev);
>          if (ret < 0) {
>              return ret;
>          }
> -        kvm_irqchip_commit_route_changes(&c);
>          irqfd->virq = ret;
>      }
>      irqfd->users++;
> @@ -903,12 +915,18 @@ static int kvm_virtio_pci_vector_vq_use(VirtIOPCIProxy 
> *proxy, int nvqs)
>      int ret = 0;
>      VirtIODevice *vdev = virtio_bus_get_device(&proxy->bus);
>  
> +    virtio_pci_begin_route_changes();
> +
>      for (queue_no = 0; queue_no < nvqs; queue_no++) {
>          if (!virtio_queue_get_num(vdev, queue_no)) {
> +            virtio_pci_commit_route_changes();
>              return -1;
>          }
>          ret = kvm_virtio_pci_vector_use_one(proxy, queue_no);
>      }
> +
> +    virtio_pci_commit_route_changes();
> +
>      return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.23.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]