qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Pegasos2 fixes and audio output support


From: Bernhard Beschow
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Pegasos2 fixes and audio output support
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 08:02:42 +0000


Am 27. Februar 2023 22:12:46 UTC schrieb "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" 
<philmd@linaro.org>:
>On 27/2/23 18:47, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2023, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
>>> Unfortunately my patches had changes merged in. This now makes it hard to
>>> show what really changed (spoiler: nothing that affects behavior).
>>> 
>>> As you probably noticed in the "resend" version of this iteration I split
>>> off a patch introducing the priq properties. It belongs to the sub series
>>> of the Pegasos2 IRQ fixes which appear unnecessary to me, so I don't want
>>> to show up in `git blame` as the author of any of these changes. I
>>> attributed it to you because this was really your change which I'm not even
>>> sure is legal.
>>> 
>>> Let's avoid such complications by keeping our series separate.
>> 
>> Let's cool down a bit. Philippe took some of the sm501 patches in his giant 
>> pull request (and a lot of your patches too) now so I'll wait until that 
>> lands and hope to get some review for the remaining patches too. Once that 
>> pull req is merged I'll rebase the remaining patches and resubmit the series 
>> also adding changes for reasonable review comments I get by then.
>
>I'm sorry it took me so long, I was expecting these patches to be picked
>up by other maintainers but everybody is very busy. I know you'll need
>to rebase and it might be painful. But I did that believing it is the
>best I could give to the project with my current capacity. Also I don't
>want to overlap (too much) into other (sub)maintained areas.
>If you are stuck with a rebase, I can try to help.
>We'll get to the end of PIIX, if this isn't this release, it will be
>the next one. I've been waiting for these cleanups since 4 years
>already, before Hervé Poussineau pushed toward that direction during
>3 years. We always hit problems due to PC world inheritance which,
>as a production system, can not regress.

Did you intend to reply in the PIIX consolidation or global ISA bus renoval 
series? This is a VT82xx thread...

Thanks for picking up the ICH9 changes!

>
>Also I don't want to compete with you guys, I'd really love to work
>together as team, but I have other responsibilities and sometime I
>can't spend the time I'd like here.
>
>What blocks the PIIX changes is the "q35/ich9/-device piix3" broken
>config. I'll explain elsewhere why it is broken. The problem is I
>don't know how to suggest alternative.
>
>Bernhard sometimes it is easier to share visions in a 30min call,
>rather than on a such thread. If you want I'm open for one.
>

Sure, I'm open for that. I'll let you know when I'll have some time.

Best regards,
Bernhard



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]