qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] linux-user: Fix unaligned memory access in prlimit64 sys


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] linux-user: Fix unaligned memory access in prlimit64 syscall
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 12:31:28 -1000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1

On 2/23/23 11:58, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
32-bit guests may enforce only 4-byte alignment for target_rlimit64,
whereas 64-bit hosts normally require the 8-byte one. Therefore
accessing this struct directly is UB.

Fix by adding a local copy.

Fixes: 163a05a8398b ("linux-user: Implement prlimit64 syscall")
Reported-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
---
  linux-user/syscall.c | 12 +++++++-----
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index a6c426d73cf..8ae7696d8f1 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -12876,7 +12876,7 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(CPUArchState *cpu_env, int 
num, abi_long arg1,
      case TARGET_NR_prlimit64:
      {
          /* args: pid, resource number, ptr to new rlimit, ptr to old rlimit */
-        struct target_rlimit64 *target_rnew, *target_rold;
+        struct target_rlimit64 *target_rnew, *target_rold, tmp;

The bug is that target_rlimit64 uses uint64_t (64-bit host alignment), when it should be using abi_ullong (64-bit target alignment). There are quite a number of these sorts of bugs in linux-user.


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]