qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v16 02/11] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU ho


From: pierre
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 02/11] s390x/cpu topology: add topology entries on CPU hotplug
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 15:35:12 +0100

On 2023-02-23 15:13, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 15:06 +0100, pierre wrote:
On 2023-02-23 13:53, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 22/02/2023 15.20, Pierre Morel wrote:
> > The topology information are attributes of the CPU and are
> > specified during the CPU device creation.
> ...
> > diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
> > b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
> > index 83f31604cc..fa7f885a9f 100644
> > --- a/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
> > +++ b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,47 @@
> >   #ifndef HW_S390X_CPU_TOPOLOGY_H
> >   #define HW_S390X_CPU_TOPOLOGY_H
> >   +#include "qemu/queue.h"
> > +#include "hw/boards.h"
> > +#include "qapi/qapi-types-machine-target.h"
> > +
> >   #define S390_TOPOLOGY_CPU_IFL   0x03
> >   +typedef struct S390Topology {
> > +    uint8_t *cores_per_socket;
> > +    CpuTopology *smp;
> > +    CpuS390Polarization polarization;
> > +} S390Topology;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> > +bool s390_has_topology(void);
> > +void s390_topology_setup_cpu(MachineState *ms, S390CPU *cpu, Error
> > **errp);
> > +#else
> > +static inline bool s390_has_topology(void)
> > +{
> > +       return false;
> > +}
> > +static inline void s390_topology_setup_cpu(MachineState *ms,
> > +                                           S390CPU *cpu,
> > +                                           Error **errp) {}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +extern S390Topology s390_topology;
> > +int s390_socket_nb(S390CPU *cpu);
> > +
> > +static inline int s390_std_socket(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
> > +{
> > +    return (n / smp->cores) % smp->sockets;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int s390_std_book(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
> > +{
> > +    return (n / (smp->cores * smp->sockets)) % smp->books;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int s390_std_drawer(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
> > +{
> > +    return (n / (smp->cores * smp->sockets * smp->books)) %
> > smp->books;
>
> Shouldn't that be " % smp->drawers" instead?

/o\  Yes it is of course.
thanks.

You can also just drop the modulo, since
n < core * sockets * books * drawers. Not that % drawers does any harm ofc.

[...]

Yes right, thanks. May be I keep it in case there is another level one of these days.

Regards,
Pierre



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]