Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] target/riscv: implement Zicboz extension

[Richard Henderson]

On 2/21/23 23:37, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Do you mean that the doc should tell whether the address to be returned in the 
> store
> access fault should be aligned and whatnot?

Yes.

> By reading target/riscv code it seems that all store acess faults are being 
> fired via
> raise_mmu_exception(), which is only called in riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(), which in 
> turn
> doesn't do any thing special with the address before firing the exception. So I 
> guess
> we can assume that badddr = aligned?

Well that's certainly how the code is written, yes.


r~