Re: [PATCH RESEND v5 00/28] target/arm: Allow CONFIG_TCG=n builds

[Fabiano Rosas]

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 20:31, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, could someone take this?
>>
>> I rebased and put the two series together to simplify. I'm keeping it
>> up-to-date and tested while it doesn't go in.
>>
>> CI run here: https://gitlab.com/farosas/qemu/-/pipelines/776103500
>>
>> Based on master.
>> Supersedes "target/arm: CONFIG_TCG=n part 1".
>
> I've taken patches 1-5 into target-arm.next.
> Patch 6 doesn't apply on top of my tree, which is unsurprising
> given that it's trying to move 9000+ lines of code in a single
> patch. That's so much I couldn't even figure out how to recreate
> the code movement locally. The diff is not very legible either.

Ugh, sorry about that. I forgot to apply --patience on this last resend.
That diff should be just a sequence of 9k '-' lines and 9k '+' lines.

I'll try to split it up, let's see how it goes, the ARMCPRegInfo arrays
are huge, they might end up pulling everything with them.