Re: [PATCH 1/4] util/cacheflush: fix illegal instruction on windows-arm64

[Richard Henderson]

On 2/15/23 02:49, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
> I'm not an expert on this area, but I imagine that booting a full VM will force TCG to 
> emit code at the same address twice (after having generated enough translated blocks), 
> which shows that generic flush_idcache_range works. Is that reasoning correct?
>
> Do you think we still need a specialized version for windows-arm64?

No, I don't think so.  It would be ideal if we were able to read CTR_EL0, because we make 
use of the IDC field, but 0 is a safe default.


r~