[PATCH v3 03/15] pci/shpc: shpc_slot_command(): handle PWRONLY -> ENABLED transition

[Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy]

ENABLED -> PWRONLY transition is not allowed and we handle it by
shpc_invalid_command(). But PWRONLY -> ENABLED transition is silently
ignored, which seems wrong. Let's handle it as correct.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
---
 hw/pci/shpc.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/pci/shpc.c b/hw/pci/shpc.c
index 5d71569b13..25e4172382 100644
--- a/hw/pci/shpc.c
+++ b/hw/pci/shpc.c
@@ -273,28 +273,22 @@ static void shpc_slot_command(SHPCDevice *shpc, uint8_t 
target,
         return;
     }
 
-    switch (power) {
-    case SHPC_LED_NO:
-        break;
-    default:
+    if (power != SHPC_LED_NO) {
         /* TODO: send event to monitor */
         shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, power, SHPC_SLOT_PWR_LED_MASK);
     }
-    switch (attn) {
-    case SHPC_LED_NO:
-        break;
-    default:
+    if (attn != SHPC_LED_NO) {
         /* TODO: send event to monitor */
         shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, attn, SHPC_SLOT_ATTN_LED_MASK);
     }
-
-    if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED && state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY) 
||
-        (current_state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED && state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED)) 
{
-        shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, state, SHPC_SLOT_STATE_MASK);
-    } else if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED ||
-                current_state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY) &&
-               state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED) {
+    if (state != SHPC_STATE_NO) {
         shpc_set_status(shpc, slot, state, SHPC_SLOT_STATE_MASK);
+    }
+
+    if ((current_state == SHPC_STATE_ENABLED ||
+         current_state == SHPC_STATE_PWRONLY) &&
+        state == SHPC_STATE_DISABLED)
+    {
         power = shpc_get_status(shpc, slot, SHPC_SLOT_PWR_LED_MASK);
         /* TODO: track what monitor requested. */
         /* Look at LED to figure out whether it's ok to remove the device. */
-- 
2.34.1