qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] qtests/arm: add some mte tests


From: Eric Auger
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] qtests/arm: add some mte tests
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 19:23:15 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1

Hi,

On 2/3/23 14:44, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>

Still as you need to respin I think adding a short commit msg wouldn't
hurt ;-) Add new cpu MTE feature tests with TCG+virt tag memory and
TCG-no tag memory (default) attempting to set cpu mte option on/off. No
real test for KVM because ../..
> ---
>  tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
> index 8691802950ca..c5dbf66e938a 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  
>  #define MACHINE     "-machine virt,gic-version=max -accel tcg "
>  #define MACHINE_KVM "-machine virt,gic-version=max -accel kvm -accel tcg "
> +#define MACHINE_MTE "-machine virt,gic-version=max,mte=on -accel tcg "
>  #define QUERY_HEAD  "{ 'execute': 'query-cpu-model-expansion', " \
>                      "  'arguments': { 'type': 'full', "
>  #define QUERY_TAIL  "}}"
> @@ -156,6 +157,18 @@ static bool resp_get_feature(QDict *resp, const char 
> *feature)
>      g_assert(qdict_get_bool(_props, feature) == (expected_value));     \
>  })
>  
> +#define resp_assert_feature_str(resp, feature, expected_value)         \
> +({                                                                     \
> +    QDict *_props;                                                     \
> +                                                                       \
> +    g_assert(_resp);                                                   \
> +    g_assert(resp_has_props(_resp));                                   \
> +    _props = resp_get_props(_resp);                                    \
> +    g_assert(qdict_get(_props, feature));                              \
> +    g_assert_cmpstr(qdict_get_try_str(_props, feature), ==,            \
> +                    expected_value);                                   \
> +})
> +
>  #define assert_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, expected_value)         \
>  ({                                                                     \
>      QDict *_resp;                                                      \
> @@ -166,6 +179,16 @@ static bool resp_get_feature(QDict *resp, const char 
> *feature)
>      qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
>  })
>  
> +#define assert_feature_str(qts, cpu_type, feature, expected_value)     \
> +({                                                                     \
> +    QDict *_resp;                                                      \
> +                                                                       \
> +    _resp = do_query_no_props(qts, cpu_type);                          \
> +    g_assert(_resp);                                                   \
> +    resp_assert_feature_str(_resp, feature, expected_value);           \
> +    qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
> +})
> +
>  #define assert_set_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, value)              \
>  ({                                                                     \
>      const char *_fmt = (value) ? "{ %s: true }" : "{ %s: false }";     \
> @@ -177,6 +200,17 @@ static bool resp_get_feature(QDict *resp, const char 
> *feature)
>      qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
>  })
>  
Not really related to your series but those macros become increasingly
difficult to follow. Especially the feature param versus format that are
partly redundant look weird: "mte", "off", "{ 'mte': 'off' }

Starting adding comments may help the reading.
> +#define assert_set_feature_str(qts, cpu_type, feature, value, _fmt)    \
> +({                                                                     \
> +    const char *__fmt = _fmt;                                          \
> +    QDict *_resp;                                                      \
> +                                                                       \
> +    _resp = do_query(qts, cpu_type, __fmt, feature);                   \
> +    g_assert(_resp);                                                   \
> +    resp_assert_feature_str(_resp, feature, value);                    \
> +    qobject_unref(_resp);                                              \
> +})
> +
>  #define assert_has_feature_enabled(qts, cpu_type, feature)             \
>      assert_feature(qts, cpu_type, feature, true)
>  
> @@ -413,6 +447,24 @@ static void sve_tests_sve_off_kvm(const void *data)
>      qtest_quit(qts);
>  }
>  
> +static void mte_tests_tag_memory_on(const void *data)
> +{
> +    QTestState *qts;
> +
> +    qts = qtest_init(MACHINE_MTE "-cpu max");
> +
> +    /*
> +     * With tag memory, "mte" should default to on, and explicitly specifying
> +     * either on or off should be fine.
> +     */
the above comment rather applies to assert_set_feature_str's, right?
> +    assert_has_feature(qts, "max", "mte");
> +
> +    assert_set_feature_str(qts, "max", "mte", "off", "{ 'mte': 'off' }");
> +    assert_set_feature_str(qts, "max", "mte", "on", "{ 'mte': 'on' }");
> +
> +    qtest_quit(qts);
> +}
> +
>  static void pauth_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
>  {
>      assert_has_feature_enabled(qts, cpu_type, "pauth");
> @@ -425,6 +477,19 @@ static void pauth_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const 
> char *cpu_type)
>                   "{ 'pauth': false, 'pauth-impdef': true }");
>  }
>  
> +static void mte_tests_default(QTestState *qts, const char *cpu_type)
> +{
> +    assert_has_feature(qts, cpu_type, "mte");
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Without tag memory, mte will be off under tcg.
> +     * Explicitly enabling it yields an error.
> +     */
> +    assert_set_feature_str(qts, "max", "mte", "off", "{ 'mte': 'off' }");
> +    assert_error(qts, cpu_type, "mte=on requires tag memory",
> +                 "{ 'mte': 'on' }");
Sorry in v4 I reported I preferred the pauth msg, clarifying now:

    assert_error(qts, cpu_type, "cannot enable pauth-impdef without pauth",
                 "{ 'pauth': false, 'pauth-impdef': true }");

Here would translate into cannot enable mte without tag memory.

> +}
> +
>  static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void *data)
>  {
>      QTestState *qts;
> @@ -474,6 +539,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion(const void 
> *data)
>  
>          sve_tests_default(qts, "max");
>          pauth_tests_default(qts, "max");
> +        mte_tests_default(qts, "max");
>  
>          /* Test that features that depend on KVM generate errors without. */
>          assert_error(qts, "max",
> @@ -517,6 +583,13 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const 
> void *data)
>          assert_set_feature(qts, "host", "pmu", false);
>          assert_set_feature(qts, "host", "pmu", true);
>  
> +        /*
> +         * Unfortunately, there's no easy way to test whether this instance
> +         * of KVM supports MTE. So we can only assert that the feature
> +         * is present, but not whether it can be toggled.
> +         */
> +        assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "mte");
I know you replied in v4 but I am still confused:
What does
      (QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"host"}
return on a MTE capable host and and on a non MTE capable host?

If I remember correctly qmp_query_cpu_model_expansion loops over the
advertised features and try to set them explicitly so if the host does
not support it this should fail and the result should be different from
the case where the host supports it (even if it is off by default)

Does assert_has_feature_enabled() returns false?

Thanks

Eric


> +
>          /*
>           * Some features would be enabled by default, but they're disabled
>           * because this instance of KVM doesn't support them. Test that the
> @@ -631,6 +704,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>                              NULL, sve_tests_sve_off);
>          qtest_add_data_func("/arm/kvm/query-cpu-model-expansion/sve-off",
>                              NULL, sve_tests_sve_off_kvm);
> +        qtest_add_data_func("/arm/max/query-cpu-model-expansion/tag-memory",
> +                            NULL, mte_tests_tag_memory_on);
>      }
>  
>      return g_test_run();




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]