|
From: | Richard Henderson |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 30/37] target/i386: reimplement 0x0f 0x10-0x17, add AVX |
Date: | Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:51:11 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 |
On 9/14/22 23:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
You've just been moving i64 pieces in the other functions, why is this one different using a gvec move in the middle? I do wonder if a generic helper moving offset->offset, with the comparison wouldn't be helpful within these functions, even when you know off1 != off2, due to Q(0) vs Q(1).Because this one is the only one that has a VEX.256 version (the operand is type "x" rather than "dq" as in MOVHLPS, MOVLHPS, MOVHPx).
Ok, then a comment would help. r~
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |