qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 03/16] qapi: fix example of query-spice command


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/16] qapi: fix example of query-spice command
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:22:29 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)

Victor Toso <victortoso@redhat.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 01:50:31PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Victor Toso <victortoso@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > Example output has an extra ',' delimiter and a foreign comment
>> > format. Fix it.
>> >
>> > Problem was noticed when trying to load the example into python's json
>> > library.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Victor Toso <victortoso@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> >  qapi/ui.json | 3 +--
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/qapi/ui.json b/qapi/ui.json
>> > index 286c5731d1..901b84da8a 100644
>> > --- a/qapi/ui.json
>> > +++ b/qapi/ui.json
>> > @@ -356,8 +356,7 @@
>> >  #                "host": "127.0.0.1",
>> >  #                "channel-id": 0,
>> >  #                "tls": false
>> > -#             },
>> > -#             [ ... more channels follow ... ]
>> > +#             }
>> >  #          ]
>> >  #       }
>> >  #    }
>>
>> Hmm.  You're removing an ellipsis Gerd put there for a reason,
>> I presume (commit cb42a870c3 "spice: add qmp 'query-spice' and
>> hmp 'info spice' commands.")
>
> I guess the reason is just that we get a too big array of
> SpiceChannels so the example output would be big but not
> interesting.
>
>> Even if we can do without it here, We may still want a way to
>> abridge examples.  Thoughts?
>
> I just want something that can be a valid QMP message so we can
> transform JSON to a specific language type and then back to QMP
> message and compare that both matches.
>
> I don't think that, for the purpose of query-spice documentation
> it is worth to have a very similar but with 10 or more entries of
> array of channels. So, I'd say it is fine to simply cut it here.
> If we have a reason to put it out a 100% valid message, well, we
> would have that reason to back it up... but I don't have one.

I agree listing more channels in the example wouldn't help users.

But do we want to indicate that the example is abridged?

Gerd, I'd like to have your Acked-by for this patch.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]