[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC
From: |
Shreyas Shah |
Subject: |
RE: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2021 22:52:56 +0000 |
Hello Folks,
Any plan to add CXL2.0 switch ports in QEMU?
Regards,
Shreyas
-----Original Message-----
From: Saransh Gupta1 <saransh@ibm.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2021 2:21 PM
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>; Ben Widawsky
<ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC
Hi Ben and Jonathan,
Thanks for your replies. I'm looking forward to the patches.
For QEMU, I see hotplug support as an item on the list and would like to start
working on it. It would be great if you can provide some pointers about how I
should go about it.
Also, which version of kernel and QEMU (maybe Jonathan's upcoming version)
would be a good starting point for it?
Thanks,
Saransh
From: "Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: "Ben Widawsky" <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: "Saransh Gupta1" <saransh@ibm.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
<qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Date: 11/17/2021 09:32 AM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 08:57:19 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Saransh. Please add the list for these kind of questions. I've
converted your
> HTML mail, but going forward, the list will eat it, so please use text
only.
>
> On 21-11-16 00:14:33, Saransh Gupta1 wrote:
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > This is Saransh from IBM. Sorry to have (unintentionally) dropped
out
> > of the conversion on OFTC, I'm new to IRC.
> > Just wanted to follow-up on the discussion there. We discussed
about
> > helping with linux patches reviews. On that front, I have
identified
> > some colleague(s) who can help me with this. Let me know if/how you
> > want to proceed with that.
>
> Currently the ball is in my court to re-roll the RFC v2 patches [1]
based on
> feedback from Dan. I've implemented all/most of it, but I'm still
debugging some
> issues with the result.
>
> >
> > Maybe not urgently, but my team would also like to get an
understanding
> > of the missing pieces in QEMU. Initially our focus is on type3
memory
> > access and hotplug support. Most of the work that my team does is
> > open-source, so contributing to the QEMU effort is another possible
> > line of collaboration.
>
> If you haven't seen it already, check out my LPC talk [2]. The QEMU
patches
> could use a lot of love. Mostly, I have little/no motivation until
upstream
> shows an interest because I don't have time currently to make sure I
don't break
> vs. upstream. If you want more details here, I can provide them, and I
will Cc
> the qemu-devel mailing list; the end of the LPC talk [2] does have a
list.
Hi Ben, Saransh
I have a forward port of the series + DOE etc to near current QEMU that is
lightly tested, and can look to push that out publicly later this week.
I'd also like to push QEMU support forwards and to start getting this upstream
in QEMU
+ fill in some of the missing parts.
Was aiming to make progress on this a few weeks ago, but as ever other
stuff
got in the way.
+CC qemu-devel in case anyone else also looking at this.
Jonathan
>
> >
> > Thanks for your help and guidance!
> >
> > Best,
> > Saransh Gupta
> > Research Staff Member, IBM Research
>
> [1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20211022183709.1199701-1-ben.widawsky@intel.com/T/#t
> [2]:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g89SLjt5Bd4&list=PLVsQ_xZBEyN3wA8Ej4BUjudXFbXuxhnfc&index=49
- Re: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC, Jonathan Cameron, 2021/11/17
- RE: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC, Saransh Gupta1, 2021/11/18
- RE: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC,
Shreyas Shah <=
- Re: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC, Ben Widawsky, 2021/11/18
- RE: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC, Shreyas Shah, 2021/11/18
- Re: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC, Ben Widawsky, 2021/11/18
- Re: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC, Alex Bennée, 2021/11/26
- Re: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC, Ben Widawsky, 2021/11/29
- Re: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC, Alex Bennée, 2021/11/29
- Re: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC, Jonathan Cameron, 2021/11/30
- Re: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC, Ben Widawsky, 2021/11/30
Re: Follow-up on the CXL discussion at OFTC, Ben Widawsky, 2021/11/18