[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw/core/loader: workaround read() size limit.
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw/core/loader: workaround read() size limit. |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:43:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 |
On 11/11/21 16:36, Jamie Iles wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 03:55:48PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Jamie,
>>
>> On 11/11/21 15:11, Jamie Iles wrote:
>>> On Linux, read() will only ever read a maximum of 0x7ffff000 bytes
>>> regardless of what is asked. If the file is larger than 0x7ffff000
>>> bytes the read will need to be broken up into multiple chunks.
>>>
>>> Cc: Luc Michel <lmichel@kalray.eu>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@nuviainc.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/core/loader.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
>>> index 348bbf535bd9..16ca9b99cf0f 100644
>>> --- a/hw/core/loader.c
>>> +++ b/hw/core/loader.c
>>> @@ -80,6 +80,34 @@ int64_t get_image_size(const char *filename)
>>> return size;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static ssize_t read_large(int fd, void *dst, size_t len)
>>> +{
>>> + /*
>>> + * man 2 read says:
>>> + *
>>> + * On Linux, read() (and similar system calls) will transfer at most
>>> + * 0x7ffff000 (2,147,479,552) bytes, returning the number of bytes
>>
>> Could you mention MAX_RW_COUNT from linux/fs.h?
>>
>>> + * actually transferred. (This is true on both 32-bit and 64-bit
>>> + * systems.)
>>
>> Maybe "This is true for both ILP32 and LP64 data models used by Linux"?
>> (because that would not be the case for the ILP64 model).
>>
>> Otherwise s/systems/Linux variants/?
>>
>>> + *
>>> + * So read in chunks no larger than 0x7ffff000 bytes.
>>> + */
>>> + size_t max_chunk_size = 0x7ffff000;
>>
>> We can declare it static const.
>
> Ack, can fix all of those up.
>
>>> + size_t offset = 0;
>>> +
>>> + while (offset < len) {
>>> + size_t chunk_len = MIN(max_chunk_size, len - offset);
>>> + ssize_t br = read(fd, dst + offset, chunk_len);
>>> +
>>> + if (br < 0) {
>>> + return br;
>>> + }
>>> + offset += br;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return (ssize_t)len;
>>> +}
>>
>> I see other read()/pread() calls:
>>
>> hw/9pfs/9p-local.c:472: tsize = read(fd, (void *)buf, bufsz);
>> hw/vfio/common.c:269: if (pread(vbasedev->fd, &buf, size,
>> region->fd_offset + addr) != size) {
>> ...
>>
>> Maybe the read_large() belongs to "sysemu/os-xxx.h"?
>
> I think util/osdep.c would be a good fit for this. To make sure we're
Yes.
> on the same page though are you proposing converting all pread/read
> calls to a qemu variant or auditing for ones that could potentially take
> a larger size?
Yes, I took some time wondering beside loading blob in guest memory,
what would be the other issues you might encounter. I couldn't find
many cases. Eventually hw/vfio/. I haven't audit much, only noticed
hw/9pfs/9p-local.c and qga/commands-*.c (not sure if relevant), but
since we want to fix this, I'd rather try to fix it globally.
[PATCH 1/2] hw/core/loader: return image sizes as ssize_t, Jamie Iles, 2021/11/11