Re: [PATCH for-6.2 v2 00/11] machine: smp parsing fixes and improvement

[wangyanan (Y)]

On 2021/7/22 15:51, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 7/21/21 2:38 PM, wangyanan (Y) wrote:
> > On 2021/7/20 0:57, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 19 2021, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This is v2 of the series [1] that I have posted to introduce some 
> > > > smp parsing
> > > > fixes and improvement, much more work has been processed compared 
> > > > to RFC v1.
> > > >
> > > > [1] 
> > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-07/msg00259.html
> > > >
> > > > The purpose of this series is to improve/fix the parsing logic. 
> > > > Explicitly
> > > > specifying a CPU topology parameter as zero is not allowed any 
> > > > more, and
> > > > maxcpus is now uniformly used to calculate the omitted parameters. 
> > > > It's also
> > > > suggested that we should start to prefer cores over sockets over 
> > > > threads on
> > > > the newer machine types, which will make the computed virtual 
> > > > topology more
> > > > reflective of the real hardware.
> > > >
> > > > In order to reduce code duplication and ease the code maintenance, 
> > > > smp_parse
> > > > in now converted into a parser generic enough for all arches, so 
> > > > that the PC
> > > > specific one can be removed. It's also convenient to introduce more 
> > > > topology
> > > > members (e.g. cluster) to the generic parser in the future.
> > > Cc:ing Pierre, as he also had been looking at the smp parsing code (for
> > > s390x) recently.
> > >
> > > Also, please keep me on cc: for patches that touch s390x.
> > Sure, I will. Sorry about the missing. :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yanan
> > .
> And me too please.
> Thanks
> Pierre
Of course.

Thanks,
Yanan