[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] block-backend: add drained_poll
From: |
Sergio Lopez |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/2] block-backend: add drained_poll |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Jun 2021 18:32:01 +0200 |
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 05:59:10PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 01.06.2021 um 07:57 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben:
> > Allow block backends to poll their devices/users to check if they have
> > been quiesced when entering a drained section.
> >
> > This will be used in the next patch to wait for the NBD server to be
> > completely quiesced.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/block-backend.c | 7 ++++++-
> > include/sysemu/block-backend.h | 4 ++++
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/block-backend.c b/block/block-backend.c
> > index de5496af66..163ca05b97 100644
> > --- a/block/block-backend.c
> > +++ b/block/block-backend.c
> > @@ -2393,8 +2393,13 @@ static void blk_root_drained_begin(BdrvChild *child)
> > static bool blk_root_drained_poll(BdrvChild *child)
> > {
> > BlockBackend *blk = child->opaque;
> > + int ret = 0;
>
> It's really a bool.
I'll fix this in v2.
Thanks,
Sergio.
> > assert(blk->quiesce_counter);
> > - return !!blk->in_flight;
> > +
> > + if (blk->dev_ops && blk->dev_ops->drained_poll) {
> > + ret = blk->dev_ops->drained_poll(blk->dev_opaque);
> > + }
> > + return ret || !!blk->in_flight;
> > }
>
> Doesn't make a difference for correctness, of course, so whether you
> change it or not:
>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature