[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/2] nbd/server: Use drained block ops to quiesce the server
From: |
Sergio Lopez |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] nbd/server: Use drained block ops to quiesce the server |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Jun 2021 18:31:29 +0200 |
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 06:08:41PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 01.06.2021 um 07:57 hat Sergio Lopez geschrieben:
> > Before switching between AioContexts we need to make sure that we're
> > fully quiesced ("nb_requests == 0" for every client) when entering the
> > drained section.
> >
> > To do this, we set "quiescing = true" for every client on
> > ".drained_begin" to prevent new coroutines to be created, and check if
> > "nb_requests == 0" on ".drained_poll". Finally, once we're exiting the
> > drained section, on ".drained_end" we set "quiescing = false" and
> > call "nbd_client_receive_next_request()" to resume the processing of
> > new requests.
> >
> > With these changes, "blk_aio_attach()" and "blk_aio_detach()" can be
> > reverted to be as simple as they were before f148ae7d36.
> >
> > RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960137
> > Suggested-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > nbd/server.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/nbd/server.c b/nbd/server.c
> > index 86a44a9b41..33e55479d7 100644
> > --- a/nbd/server.c
> > +++ b/nbd/server.c
> > @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ struct NBDClient {
> > CoMutex send_lock;
> > Coroutine *send_coroutine;
> >
> > - bool read_yielding;
> > + GSList *yield_co_list; /* List of coroutines yielding on nbd_read_eof
> > */
> > bool quiescing;
>
> Hm, how do you get more than one coroutine per client yielding in
> nbd_read_eof() at the same time? I thought the model is that you always
> have one coroutine reading the next request (which is
> client->recv_coroutine) and all the others are just processing the
> request they had read earlier. Multiple coroutines reading from the
> same socket would sound like a bad idea.
You're right, there's only a single coroutine yielding on
nbd_read_eof(). I've added the list while at a moment I was trying to
keep track of every coroutine, and I kept it without thinking if it
was really needed.
I'll drop it, entering just client->recv_coroutine is it isn't NULL.
> > QTAILQ_ENTRY(NBDClient) next;
> > @@ -1367,6 +1367,7 @@ static inline int coroutine_fn
> > nbd_read_eof(NBDClient *client, void *buffer, size_t size, Error **errp)
> > {
> > bool partial = false;
> > + Coroutine *co;
> >
> > assert(size);
> > while (size > 0) {
> > @@ -1375,9 +1376,12 @@ nbd_read_eof(NBDClient *client, void *buffer, size_t
> > size, Error **errp)
> >
> > len = qio_channel_readv(client->ioc, &iov, 1, errp);
> > if (len == QIO_CHANNEL_ERR_BLOCK) {
> > - client->read_yielding = true;
> > + co = qemu_coroutine_self();
> > +
> > + client->yield_co_list = g_slist_prepend(client->yield_co_list,
> > co);
> > qio_channel_yield(client->ioc, G_IO_IN);
> > - client->read_yielding = false;
> > + client->yield_co_list = g_slist_remove(client->yield_co_list,
> > co);
> > +
> > if (client->quiescing) {
> > return -EAGAIN;
> > }
> > @@ -1513,6 +1517,11 @@ static void nbd_request_put(NBDRequestData *req)
> > g_free(req);
> >
> > client->nb_requests--;
> > +
> > + if (client->quiescing && client->nb_requests == 0) {
> > + aio_wait_kick();
> > + }
> > +
> > nbd_client_receive_next_request(client);
> >
> > nbd_client_put(client);
> > @@ -1530,49 +1539,75 @@ static void blk_aio_attached(AioContext *ctx, void
> > *opaque)
> > QTAILQ_FOREACH(client, &exp->clients, next) {
> > qio_channel_attach_aio_context(client->ioc, ctx);
> >
> > + assert(client->nb_requests == 0);
> > assert(client->recv_coroutine == NULL);
> > assert(client->send_coroutine == NULL);
> > -
> > - if (client->quiescing) {
> > - client->quiescing = false;
> > - nbd_client_receive_next_request(client);
> > - }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static void nbd_aio_detach_bh(void *opaque)
> > +static void blk_aio_detach(void *opaque)
> > {
> > NBDExport *exp = opaque;
> > NBDClient *client;
> >
> > + trace_nbd_blk_aio_detach(exp->name, exp->common.ctx);
> > +
> > QTAILQ_FOREACH(client, &exp->clients, next) {
> > qio_channel_detach_aio_context(client->ioc);
> > + }
> > +
> > + exp->common.ctx = NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void nbd_drained_begin(void *opaque)
> > +{
> > + NBDExport *exp = opaque;
> > + NBDClient *client;
> > +
> > + QTAILQ_FOREACH(client, &exp->clients, next) {
> > client->quiescing = true;
> > + }
> > +}
> >
> > - if (client->recv_coroutine) {
> > - if (client->read_yielding) {
> > - qemu_aio_coroutine_enter(exp->common.ctx,
> > - client->recv_coroutine);
> > - } else {
> > - AIO_WAIT_WHILE(exp->common.ctx, client->recv_coroutine !=
> > NULL);
> > - }
> > - }
> > +static void nbd_drained_end(void *opaque)
> > +{
> > + NBDExport *exp = opaque;
> > + NBDClient *client;
> >
> > - if (client->send_coroutine) {
> > - AIO_WAIT_WHILE(exp->common.ctx, client->send_coroutine !=
> > NULL);
> > - }
> > + QTAILQ_FOREACH(client, &exp->clients, next) {
> > + client->quiescing = false;
> > + nbd_client_receive_next_request(client);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -static void blk_aio_detach(void *opaque)
> > +static bool nbd_drained_poll(void *opaque)
> > {
> > NBDExport *exp = opaque;
> > + NBDClient *client;
> > + Coroutine *co;
> > + GSList *entry;
> > + GSList *coroutine_list;
> >
> > - trace_nbd_blk_aio_detach(exp->name, exp->common.ctx);
> > + QTAILQ_FOREACH(client, &exp->clients, next) {
> > + if (client->nb_requests != 0) {
> > + /*
> > + * Enter coroutines waiting for new requests on
> > nbd_read_eof(), so
> > + * we don't depend on the client to wake us up.
> > + */
> > + coroutine_list = g_slist_copy(client->yield_co_list);
> > + for (entry = coroutine_list;
> > + entry != NULL;
> > + entry = g_slist_next(entry)) {
> > + co = entry->data;
> > + qemu_aio_coroutine_enter(exp->common.ctx, co);
> > + }
> > + g_slist_free(coroutine_list);
> >
> > - aio_wait_bh_oneshot(exp->common.ctx, nbd_aio_detach_bh, exp);
> > + return 1;
>
> This would be more accurately spelt true...
>
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > - exp->common.ctx = NULL;
> > + return 0;
>
> ...and this false.
I'll change this in v2.
Thanks,
Sergio.
> > }
> >
> > static void nbd_eject_notifier(Notifier *n, void *data)
>
> The patch looks correct to me, though I'm not sure if yield_co_list is
> an unnecessary complication (and if it isn't, whether that's safe).
>
> I would be happy enough to apply it anyway if you can explain the
> yield_co_list thing, but I'll give Eric some time to have a look, too.
>
> Kevin
>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature