qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] target/riscv: Convert the RISC-V exceptions to an enu


From: Alistair Francis
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] target/riscv: Convert the RISC-V exceptions to an enum
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:19:45 -0400

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:58 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:41 AM Alistair Francis
> <alistair.francis@wdc.com> wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> > ---
> >  target/riscv/cpu_bits.h   | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >  target/riscv/cpu.c        |  2 +-
> >  target/riscv/cpu_helper.c |  4 ++--
> >  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > index caf4599207..8ae404c32a 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
> > @@ -527,27 +527,29 @@
> >  #define DEFAULT_RSTVEC      0x1000
> >
> >  /* Exception causes */
> > -#define EXCP_NONE                                -1 /* sentinel value */
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_INST_ADDR_MIS                 0x0
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_INST_ACCESS_FAULT             0x1
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST                  0x2
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_BREAKPOINT                    0x3
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_ADDR_MIS                 0x4
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_ACCESS_FAULT             0x5
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_STORE_AMO_ADDR_MIS            0x6
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_STORE_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT        0x7
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_U_ECALL                       0x8
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_S_ECALL                      0x9
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_VS_ECALL                      0xa
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_M_ECALL                       0xb
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_INST_PAGE_FAULT               0xc /* since: priv-1.10.0 
> > */
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT               0xd /* since: priv-1.10.0 
> > */
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_STORE_PAGE_FAULT              0xf /* since: priv-1.10.0 
> > */
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST                      0x10
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_INST_GUEST_PAGE_FAULT         0x14
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_GUEST_ACCESS_FAULT       0x15
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT        0x16
> > -#define RISCV_EXCP_STORE_GUEST_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT  0x17
> > +typedef enum RiscVException {
>
> nits: looking at other places in the RISC-V codes, I believe it's
> better to name it "RISCVException"

I agree, I have fixed the name.

>
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_NONE = -1, /* sentinel value */
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_INST_ADDR_MIS = 0x0,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_INST_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x1,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST = 0x2,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_BREAKPOINT = 0x3,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_ADDR_MIS = 0x4,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x5,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_STORE_AMO_ADDR_MIS = 0x6,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_STORE_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x7,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_U_ECALL = 0x8,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_S_ECALL = 0x9,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_VS_ECALL = 0xa,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_M_ECALL = 0xb,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_INST_PAGE_FAULT = 0xc, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_PAGE_FAULT = 0xd, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_STORE_PAGE_FAULT = 0xf, /* since: priv-1.10.0 */
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_SEMIHOST = 0x10,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_INST_GUEST_PAGE_FAULT = 0x14,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_LOAD_GUEST_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x15,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT = 0x16,
> > +    RISCV_EXCP_STORE_GUEST_AMO_ACCESS_FAULT = 0x17,
> > +} RiscVException;
> >
> >  #define RISCV_EXCP_INT_FLAG                0x80000000
> >  #define RISCV_EXCP_INT_MASK                0x7fffffff
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > index 2a990f6253..63584b4a20 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ static void riscv_cpu_reset(DeviceState *dev)
> >      env->mcause = 0;
> >      env->pc = env->resetvec;
> >  #endif
> > -    cs->exception_index = EXCP_NONE;
> > +    cs->exception_index = RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> >      env->load_res = -1;
> >      set_default_nan_mode(1, &env->fp_status);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > index 83a6bcfad0..af702f65b1 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int riscv_cpu_local_irq_pending(CPURISCVState *env)
> >      if (irqs) {
> >          return ctz64(irqs); /* since non-zero */
> >      } else {
> > -        return EXCP_NONE; /* indicates no pending interrupt */
> > +        return RISCV_EXCP_NONE; /* indicates no pending interrupt */
> >      }
> >  }
> >  #endif
> > @@ -1017,5 +1017,5 @@ void riscv_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> >       */
> >
> >  #endif
> > -    cs->exception_index = EXCP_NONE; /* mark handled to qemu */
> > +    cs->exception_index = RISCV_EXCP_NONE; /* mark handled to qemu */
> >  }
> > --
>
> Otherwise,
> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>

Thanks!

Alistair



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]