qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC v3 9/9] i386: split cpu accelerators from cpu.c


From: Claudio Fontana
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 9/9] i386: split cpu accelerators from cpu.c
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:53:09 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0

Hi,

On 11/18/20 7:28 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:29:36AM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote:
>> split cpu.c into:
>>
>> cpu.c            cpuid and common x86 cpu functionality
>> host-cpu.c       host x86 cpu functions and "host" cpu type
>> kvm/cpu.c        KVM x86 cpu type
>> hvf/cpu.c        HVF x86 cpu type
>> tcg/cpu.c        TCG x86 cpu type
>>
>> The accel interface of the X86CPUClass is set at MODULE_INIT_ACCEL_CPU
>> time, when the accelerator is known.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de>
>> ---
> [...]
>> +/**
>> + * X86CPUAccel:
>> + * @name: string name of the X86 CPU Accelerator
>> + *
>> + * @common_class_init: initializer for the common cpu
> 
> So this will be called for every single CPU class.

Not really, it's called for every TYPE_X86_CPU cpu class (if an accel interface 
is registered).

This function extends the existing x86_cpu_common_class_init 
(target/i386/cpu.c),
where some methods of the base class CPUClass are set.

> 
>> + * @instance_init: cpu instance initialization
>> + * @realizefn: realize function, called first in x86 cpu realize
>> + *
>> + * X86 CPU accelerator-specific CPU initializations
>> + */
>> +
>> +struct X86CPUAccel {
>> +    const char *name;
>> +
>> +    void (*common_class_init)(X86CPUClass *xcc);
>> +    void (*instance_init)(X86CPU *cpu);
>> +    void (*realizefn)(X86CPU *cpu, Error **errp);
>>  };
>>  
>> +void x86_cpu_accel_init(const X86CPUAccel *accel);
> [...]
>> +static void x86_cpu_accel_init_aux(ObjectClass *klass, void *opaque)
>> +{
>> +    X86CPUClass *xcc = X86_CPU_CLASS(klass);
>> +    const X86CPUAccel **accel = opaque;
>> +
>> +    xcc->accel = *accel;
>> +    xcc->accel->common_class_init(xcc);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void x86_cpu_accel_init(const X86CPUAccel *accel)
>> +{
>> +    object_class_foreach(x86_cpu_accel_init_aux, TYPE_X86_CPU, false, 
>> &accel);
>> +}
> 
> This matches the documented behavior.
> 
> [...]
>> +void host_cpu_class_init(X86CPUClass *xcc)
>> +{
>> +    xcc->host_cpuid_required = true;
>> +    xcc->ordering = 8;
>> +    xcc->model_description =
>> +        g_strdup_printf("%s processor with all supported host features ",
>> +                        xcc->accel->name);
>> +}
> [...]
>> +static void hvf_cpu_common_class_init(X86CPUClass *xcc)
>> +{
>> +    host_cpu_class_init(xcc);
> 
> Why are you calling host_cpu_class_init() for all CPU types?

I am not..

> 
>> +}
> [...]
>> +static void kvm_cpu_common_class_init(X86CPUClass *xcc)
>> +{
>> +    host_cpu_class_init(xcc);
>> +}
> 
> Same question as above.
> 

Ciao,

Claudio



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]