[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Migrating to the gitlab issue tracker
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: Migrating to the gitlab issue tracker |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Nov 2020 08:42:05 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 |
On 11/2/20 8:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 02:57:49PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 10/30/20 10:16, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:01:27PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>>>> In experimenting with my mirror on gitlab though, I was unable to find a
>>>> way
>>>> to configure it to send issue tracker notifications to the email list. A
>>>> move to gitlab would likely mean, then:
>>>>
>>>> 1. The cessation of (automatic) issue tracker mails to the list
>>>
>>> A bot could do this.
>>
>> I think a "bug traffic" mailing list (possibly but not necessarily
>> separate from the main qemu development list) is important.
>
> What benefit is there to a bug traffic mailing list, as opposed to people
> subscribing to direct bug notifications ? In both case people who are
> interested in watching bugs can get the same content in their inboxes.
A mailing list would have archives (which can be helpful for archaeology
of past bug traffic even when you were not a gitlab subscriber), and
(depending on subscription settings) could permit additional
conversation in response to traffic by non-gitlab contributors. But you
are right that a mailing list configured as read-only bug traffic (where
replies are not permitted) has no benefit over developers directly
subscribing to bug activity.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org