[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plu
From: |
Ani Sinha |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:35:42 +0530 |
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 9:22 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:19:19AM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> > On Sep 10, 2020, 00:00 +0530, Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>, wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 9, 2020, 23:20 +0530, Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>, wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:10 PM Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Cold plugged bridges are not hot unpluggable, even when their
> > hotplug
> >
> > property (acpi-pci-hotplug-with-bridge-support) is turned off.
> > Please see
> >
> > the function acpi_pcihp_pc_no_hotplug() (thanks Julia). However,
> > with
> >
> > the current implementaton, windows would try to hot-unplug a pci
> > bridge when
> >
> > it's hotplug switch is off. This is regardless of whether there
> > are
> > devices
> >
> > attached to the bridge. This is because we add amls like _EJ0
> > etc
> > for the
> >
> > pci slot where the bridge is cold plugged. We have a demo video
> > here:
> >
> > https://youtu.be/pME2sjyQweo
> >
> >
> >
> > In this fix, we identify a cold plugged bridge and for cold
> > plugged
> > bridges,
> >
> > we do not add the appropriate amls and acpi methods that are
> > used
> > by the OS
> >
> > to identify a hot-pluggable/unpluggable pci device. After this
> > change, Windows
> >
> > does not show an option to eject the PCI bridge. A demo video is
> > here:
> >
> > https://youtu.be/kbgej5B9Hgs
> >
> >
> >
> > While at it, I have also updated a stale comment.
> >
> >
> >
> > This change is tested with a Windows 2012R2 guest image and
> > Windows
> > 2019 server
> >
> > guest image running on Ubuntu 18.04 host. This change is based
> > off
> > of upstream
> >
> > qemu master branch tag v5.1.0.
> >
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
> >
> >
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > BTW, aren't all bridges handled in build_append_pci_bus_devices()
> > cold-plugged?
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes they are.
> >
> >
> > Maybe as an improvement we can simply identify a bridge instead of a cold
> > plugged bridge. However let’s have that improvement as a separate patch on
> > top
> > of this. Also let’s see what Igor thinks.
>
> Well this changes acpi tables so I don't see how this will pass
> the unit tests. Did you test this change?
There were no unit tests to cover this bridge flag. I have added the
unit tests. It's the same one you have queued.
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> >
> > hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 12 ++++++------
> >
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> >
> > changelog:
> >
> > v3: commit log updates providing more accurate information as
> > received from Julia.
> >
> > v2: cosmetic commit log updates with patch testing information.
> >
> > v1: initial patch.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> >
> > index b7bcbbbb2a..90b863f4ec 100644
> >
> > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> >
> > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> >
> > @@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ static void build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml
> > *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
> >
> > int slot = PCI_SLOT(i);
> >
> > bool hotplug_enabled_dev;
> >
> > bool bridge_in_acpi;
> >
> > + bool cold_plugged_bridge;
> >
> >
> >
> > if (!pdev) {
> >
> > if (bsel) { /* add hotplug slots for non present devices */
> >
> > @@ -380,15 +381,14 @@ static void
> > build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml
> > *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
> >
> > pc = PCI_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(pdev);
> >
> > dc = DEVICE_GET_CLASS(pdev);
> >
> >
> >
> > - /* When hotplug for bridges is enabled, bridges are
> >
> > - * described in ACPI separately (see build_pci_bus_end).
> >
> > - * In this case they aren't themselves hot-pluggable.
> >
> > + /*
> >
> > + * Cold plugged bridges aren't themselves hot-pluggable.
> >
> > * Hotplugged bridges *are* hot-pluggable.
> >
> > */
> >
> > - bridge_in_acpi = pc->is_bridge && pcihp_bridge_en &&
> >
> > - !DEVICE(pdev)->hotplugged;
> >
> > + cold_plugged_bridge = pc->is_bridge &&
> > !DEVICE(pdev)->hotplugged;
> >
> > + bridge_in_acpi = cold_plugged_bridge && pcihp_bridge_en;
> >
> >
> >
> > - hotplug_enabled_dev = bsel && dc->hotpluggable && !
> > bridge_in_acpi;
> >
> > + hotplug_enabled_dev = bsel && dc->hotpluggable && !
> > cold_plugged_bridge;
> >
> >
> >
> > if (pc->class_id == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_ISA) {
> >
> > continue;
> >
> > --
> >
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
- [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/04
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Julia Suvorova, 2020/09/09
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/09
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/09
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2020/09/11
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges,
Ani Sinha <=
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2020/09/11
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/11
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/11
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/11