[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plu
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:52:05 -0400 |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:19:19AM +0530, Ani Sinha wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2020, 00:00 +0530, Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>, wrote:
>
> On Sep 9, 2020, 23:20 +0530, Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>, wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 6:10 PM Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
> Cold plugged bridges are not hot unpluggable, even when their
> hotplug
>
> property (acpi-pci-hotplug-with-bridge-support) is turned off.
> Please see
>
> the function acpi_pcihp_pc_no_hotplug() (thanks Julia). However,
> with
>
> the current implementaton, windows would try to hot-unplug a pci
> bridge when
>
> it's hotplug switch is off. This is regardless of whether there
> are
> devices
>
> attached to the bridge. This is because we add amls like _EJ0 etc
> for the
>
> pci slot where the bridge is cold plugged. We have a demo video
> here:
>
> https://youtu.be/pME2sjyQweo
>
>
>
> In this fix, we identify a cold plugged bridge and for cold
> plugged
> bridges,
>
> we do not add the appropriate amls and acpi methods that are used
> by the OS
>
> to identify a hot-pluggable/unpluggable pci device. After this
> change, Windows
>
> does not show an option to eject the PCI bridge. A demo video is
> here:
>
> https://youtu.be/kbgej5B9Hgs
>
>
>
> While at it, I have also updated a stale comment.
>
>
>
> This change is tested with a Windows 2012R2 guest image and
> Windows
> 2019 server
>
> guest image running on Ubuntu 18.04 host. This change is based off
> of upstream
>
> qemu master branch tag v5.1.0.
>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
>
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
>
>
>
> BTW, aren't all bridges handled in build_append_pci_bus_devices()
> cold-plugged?
>
>
>
> Yes they are.
>
>
> Maybe as an improvement we can simply identify a bridge instead of a cold
> plugged bridge. However let’s have that improvement as a separate patch on top
> of this. Also let’s see what Igor thinks.
Well this changes acpi tables so I don't see how this will pass
the unit tests. Did you test this change?
>
>
>
> ---
>
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 12 ++++++------
>
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>
>
> changelog:
>
> v3: commit log updates providing more accurate information as
> received from Julia.
>
> v2: cosmetic commit log updates with patch testing information.
>
> v1: initial patch.
>
>
>
>
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>
> index b7bcbbbb2a..90b863f4ec 100644
>
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>
> @@ -359,6 +359,7 @@ static void build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml
> *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
>
> int slot = PCI_SLOT(i);
>
> bool hotplug_enabled_dev;
>
> bool bridge_in_acpi;
>
> + bool cold_plugged_bridge;
>
>
>
> if (!pdev) {
>
> if (bsel) { /* add hotplug slots for non present devices */
>
> @@ -380,15 +381,14 @@ static void build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml
> *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
>
> pc = PCI_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(pdev);
>
> dc = DEVICE_GET_CLASS(pdev);
>
>
>
> - /* When hotplug for bridges is enabled, bridges are
>
> - * described in ACPI separately (see build_pci_bus_end).
>
> - * In this case they aren't themselves hot-pluggable.
>
> + /*
>
> + * Cold plugged bridges aren't themselves hot-pluggable.
>
> * Hotplugged bridges *are* hot-pluggable.
>
> */
>
> - bridge_in_acpi = pc->is_bridge && pcihp_bridge_en &&
>
> - !DEVICE(pdev)->hotplugged;
>
> + cold_plugged_bridge = pc->is_bridge &&
> !DEVICE(pdev)->hotplugged;
>
> + bridge_in_acpi = cold_plugged_bridge && pcihp_bridge_en;
>
>
>
> - hotplug_enabled_dev = bsel && dc->hotpluggable && !
> bridge_in_acpi;
>
> + hotplug_enabled_dev = bsel && dc->hotpluggable && !
> cold_plugged_bridge;
>
>
>
> if (pc->class_id == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_ISA) {
>
> continue;
>
> --
>
> 2.17.1
>
>
>
>
>
- [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/04
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/07
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Julia Suvorova, 2020/09/09
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/09
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/09
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/11
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2020/09/11
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/11
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/11
- Re: [PATCH v3] i440fx/acpi: do not add hotplug related amls for cold plugged bridges, Ani Sinha, 2020/09/11