[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] testing: Build WHPX enabled binaries

From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] testing: Build WHPX enabled binaries
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:23:08 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0

On 8/4/20 8:55 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 04.08.20 um 08:43 schrieb Thomas Huth:
>> On 03/08/2020 22.25, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>> We can add a CI pipeline on Microsoft infrastructure by using a GitHub
>>> action.
>> Sorry for being ignorant, but how does that solve the legal questions
>> just because it is running on GitHub instead of a different CI?
>>  Thomas
> Sorry, I though that would be clear by looking at the included shell script.
> The build does not use the Microsoft SDK. It gets the required header
> files from Mingw-w64. They added them in git master.

Oh, so we can do that with GitLab too now, we don't need to rely on the
GitHub 'Actions' CI in particular, right?

> See
> https://github.com/stweil/qemu/blob/master/.github/workflows/build.sh#L50
> for code details.
> It's still shameful that MS is forcing developers to waste time
> rewriting API headers, just because the MS legal departments are not
> able to understand the needs of Open Source development.

There has be a big switch from Microsoft toward Open Source, I attended
some of there talk at the Open Source Summit in 2018. Maybe we simply
haven't contacted the right persons to make the changes...?

> Stefan

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]