[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] testing: Build WHPX enabled binaries

From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] testing: Build WHPX enabled binaries
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 05:36:02 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0

On 8/18/20 11:20 PM, Sunil Muthuswamy wrote:
>>>> It's still shameful that MS is forcing developers to waste time
>>>> rewriting API headers, just because the MS legal departments are not
>>>> able to understand the needs of Open Source development.
>>> There has be a big switch from Microsoft toward Open Source, I attended
>>> some of there talk at the Open Source Summit in 2018. Maybe we simply
>>> haven't contacted the right persons to make the changes...?
>> Maybe, but it is difficult to find the right person in a large company
>> like MS, and legal departments are often somehow special.
>> And yes, they learned that Open Source can help them for their business,
>> too.
>> Stefan
> Mike Battista is the program manager owner of the SDK license and should be
> able to take/respond to any feedback about the SDK licensing for open source
> projects (I have added him here). He has also been added to previous threads
> about the licensing and is also included in this conversation:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1879672

Hi Mike, thanks for helping us with this issue!

And thanks a lot Sunil to bring Mike here :)

> - Sunil

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]