[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH for-5.1] qemu-img resize: Require --shrink for shrinking all
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH for-5.1] qemu-img resize: Require --shrink for shrinking all image formats |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jul 2020 13:33:01 +0100 |
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 at 13:17, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> QEMU 2.11 introduced the --shrink option for qemu-img resize to avoid
> accidentally shrinking images (commit 4ffca8904a3). However, for
> compatibility reasons, it was not enforced for raw images yet, but only
> a deprecation warning was printed. This warning has existed for long
> enough that we can now finally require --shrink for raw images, too, and
> error out if it's not given.
>
> Documentation already describes the state as it is after this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
> qemu-img.c | 17 +++--------------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c
> index e3b2ec3e78..f6a2703039 100644
> --- a/qemu-img.c
> +++ b/qemu-img.c
> @@ -4011,20 +4011,9 @@ static int img_resize(int argc, char **argv)
> }
>
> if (total_size < current_size && !shrink) {
> - warn_report("Shrinking an image will delete all data beyond the "
> - "shrunken image's end. Before performing such an "
> - "operation, make sure there is no important data
> there.");
> -
> - if (g_strcmp0(bdrv_get_format_name(blk_bs(blk)), "raw") != 0) {
> - error_report(
> - "Use the --shrink option to perform a shrink operation.");
> - ret = -1;
> - goto out;
> - } else {
> - warn_report("Using the --shrink option will suppress this
> message. "
> - "Note that future versions of qemu-img may refuse to
> "
> - "shrink images without this option.");
> - }
> + error_report("Use the --shrink option to perform a shrink
> operation.");
I think it would be nice to retain this bit of text:
> - warn_report("Shrinking an image will delete all data beyond the "
> - "shrunken image's end. Before performing such an "
> - "operation, make sure there is no important data
> there.");
ie, make the raw-shrink case be the same as the non-raw-shrink
case currently does.
thanks
-- PMM