qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] pc-bios: s390x: Fix bootmap.c passing PSWs as addre


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] pc-bios: s390x: Fix bootmap.c passing PSWs as addresses
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 14:46:23 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

On 24/06/2020 09.52, Janosch Frank wrote:
The component entries written by zipl contain short PSWs, not
addresses. Let's mask them and only pass the address part to
jump_to_IPL_code(uint64_t address) because it expects an address as
visible by the name of the argument.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
  pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c | 5 +++--
  pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.h | 2 +-
  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c
index 97205674e5..8547a140df 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include "libc.h"
  #include "s390-ccw.h"
+#include "s390-arch.h"
  #include "bootmap.h"
  #include "virtio.h"
  #include "bswap.h"
@@ -436,7 +437,7 @@ static void zipl_load_segment(ComponentEntry *entry)
      char *blk_no = &err_msg[30]; /* where to print blockno in (those ZZs) */
blockno = entry->data.blockno;
-    address = entry->load_address;
+    address = entry->psw & PSW_MASK_SHORT_ADDR;

Are you really sure about this one here? The address does not seem to be used for any of the jump_to_IPL() functions. And in the zipl sources, I can also see spots like this:

   entry->compdat.load_address = data.load_address;

... without any further short mask bits. So I somehow doubt that this change is really ok?

      debug_print_int("loading segment at block", blockno);
      debug_print_int("addr", address);
@@ -514,7 +515,7 @@ static void zipl_run(ScsiBlockPtr *pte)
      IPL_assert(entry->component_type == ZIPL_COMP_ENTRY_EXEC, "No EXEC 
entry");
/* should not return */
-    jump_to_IPL_code(entry->load_address);
+    jump_to_IPL_code(entry->psw & PSW_MASK_SHORT_ADDR);

That one should be fine, I think.

  }
static void ipl_scsi(void)
diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.h
index 12a0166aae..e07f87e690 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.h
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/bootmap.h
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ typedef struct ComponentEntry {
      ScsiBlockPtr data;
      uint8_t pad[7];
      uint8_t component_type;
-    uint64_t load_address;
+    uint64_t psw;

I'd recommend to keep the load_address name. It's the same name as used in the zipl sources, and as far as I can see, the field does not always contain a PSW.

  } __attribute((packed)) ComponentEntry;
typedef struct ComponentHeader {


 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]