qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] pc-bios: s390x: Get rid of magic offsets into the l


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] pc-bios: s390x: Get rid of magic offsets into the lowcore
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 12:26:37 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

On 24/06/2020 09.52, Janosch Frank wrote:
If we have a lowcore struct that has members for offsets that we want
to touch, why not use it?

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
  pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h  | 17 +++++++++++------
  pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c |  8 +++-----
  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
index aaa432dedd..1e5d4e92e1 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
@@ -122,12 +122,17 @@ typedef struct schib {
  } __attribute__ ((packed, aligned(4))) Schib;
typedef struct subchannel_id {
-        __u32 cssid:8;
-        __u32:4;
-        __u32 m:1;
-        __u32 ssid:2;
-        __u32 one:1;
-        __u32 sch_no:16;
+    union {
+        struct {
+            __u16 cssid:8;
+            __u16 reserved:4;
+            __u16 m:1;
+            __u16 ssid:2;
+            __u16 one:1;
+        };
+        __u16 sch_id;
+    };
+    __u16 sch_no;
  } __attribute__ ((packed, aligned(4))) SubChannelId;
struct chsc_header {
diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
index 4e65b411e1..8b912454c9 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
@@ -36,11 +36,9 @@ LowCore *lowcore; /* Yes, this *is* a pointer to address 0 */
   */
  void write_subsystem_identification(void)
  {
-    SubChannelId *schid = (SubChannelId *) 184;
-    uint32_t *zeroes = (uint32_t *) 188;
-
-    *schid = blk_schid;
-    *zeroes = 0;
+    lowcore->subchannel_id = blk_schid.sch_id;
+    lowcore->subchannel_nr = blk_schid.sch_no;
+    lowcore->io_int_parm = 0;
  }

Ok, I have to admit that I had to read it multiple times (maybe not enough coffee the last time), but it looks fine to me now.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]