Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] block: Add blk_new_with_bs() helper

[Max Reitz]

On 24.04.20 16:18, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 4/24/20 5:02 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> 
>>> (With the Patchew warning fixed, of course (i.e., we should set ret to
>>> -EPERM or something in qcow.c))
>>
>> Er, well, maybe I should have looked into more places.  The compiler
>> only warns about that single one because it’s the only place where @ret
>> is really uninitialized, but there are many more where we need to set
>> it: crypto.c, parallels.c, qcow.c, qcow2.c (both hunks), qed.c,
>> sheepdog.c, vdi.c, vhdx.c, and vpc.c.
>>
>> (So basically everywhere but vmdk.c, blockdev.c, and blockjob.c.)
> 
> Urgh - so it's even less of a win in terms of reduced lines of code.

True, but I still consider it a win in terms of reduced complexity.
Before, we have two function calls with two variable assignments from
their return values (@blk and @ret).  Afterwards, we’ll have a single
function all with one variable assignment from its return value (@blk),
and one stand-alone variable assignment with a constant value (“ret =
-EPERM” or similar). :)

Max

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature