[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 19/42] nvme: enforce valid queue creation sequence
From: |
Maxim Levitsky |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 19/42] nvme: enforce valid queue creation sequence |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:43:40 +0200 |
On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 07:29 -0700, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <address@hidden>
>
> Support returning Command Sequence Error if Set Features on Number of
> Queues is called after queues have been created.
>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/block/nvme.c | 7 +++++++
> hw/block/nvme.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
> index 007f8817f101..b40d27cddc46 100644
> --- a/hw/block/nvme.c
> +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
> @@ -881,6 +881,8 @@ static uint16_t nvme_create_cq(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeCmd *cmd)
> cq = g_malloc0(sizeof(*cq));
> nvme_init_cq(cq, n, prp1, cqid, vector, qsize + 1,
> NVME_CQ_FLAGS_IEN(qflags));
> +
> + n->qs_created = true;
Very minor nitpick, maybe it is worth mentioning in a comment,
why this is only needed in CQ creation, as you explained to me.
> return NVME_SUCCESS;
> }
>
> @@ -1194,6 +1196,10 @@ static uint16_t nvme_set_feature(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeCmd
> *cmd, NvmeRequest *req)
> blk_set_enable_write_cache(n->conf.blk, dw11 & 1);
> break;
> case NVME_NUMBER_OF_QUEUES:
> + if (n->qs_created) {
> + return NVME_CMD_SEQ_ERROR | NVME_DNR;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * NVMe v1.3, Section 5.21.1.7: 0xffff is not an allowed value for
> NCQR
> * and NSQR.
> @@ -1332,6 +1338,7 @@ static void nvme_clear_ctrl(NvmeCtrl *n)
>
> n->aer_queued = 0;
> n->outstanding_aers = 0;
> + n->qs_created = false;
>
> blk_flush(n->conf.blk);
> n->bar.cc = 0;
> diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.h b/hw/block/nvme.h
> index b709a8bb8d40..b4d1738a3d0a 100644
> --- a/hw/block/nvme.h
> +++ b/hw/block/nvme.h
> @@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ typedef struct NvmeCtrl {
> BlockConf conf;
> NvmeParams params;
>
> + bool qs_created;
> uint32_t page_size;
> uint16_t page_bits;
> uint16_t max_prp_ents;
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <address@hidden>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
- Re: [PATCH v6 14/42] nvme: add missing mandatory features, (continued)
- [PATCH v6 13/42] nvme: add support for the asynchronous event request command, Klaus Jensen, 2020/03/16
- [PATCH v6 20/42] nvme: provide the mandatory subnqn field, Klaus Jensen, 2020/03/16
- [PATCH v6 21/42] nvme: bump supported version to v1.3, Klaus Jensen, 2020/03/16
- [PATCH v6 22/42] nvme: memset preallocated requests structures, Klaus Jensen, 2020/03/16
- [PATCH v6 19/42] nvme: enforce valid queue creation sequence, Klaus Jensen, 2020/03/16
- Re: [PATCH v6 19/42] nvme: enforce valid queue creation sequence,
Maxim Levitsky <=
- [PATCH v6 24/42] nvme: remove redundant has_sg member, Klaus Jensen, 2020/03/16
[PATCH v6 26/42] nvme: pass request along for tracing, Klaus Jensen, 2020/03/16
[PATCH v6 34/42] pci: pass along the return value of dma_memory_rw, Klaus Jensen, 2020/03/16
[PATCH v6 33/42] nvme: use preallocated qsg/iov in nvme_dma_prp, Klaus Jensen, 2020/03/16