|
From: | Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] .travis.yml: Add description to each job |
Date: | Wed, 29 Jan 2020 08:27:07 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 |
On 1/29/20 8:20 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 28/01/2020 14.33, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta wrote:On 1/28/20 11:18 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:55 PM Alex Bennée <address@hidden> wrote:Thomas Huth <address@hidden> writes:On 25/01/2020 19.31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:The NAME variable can be used to describe nicely a job (see [*]). As we currently have 32 jobs, use it. This helps for quickly finding a particular job. before: https://travis-ci.org/qemu/qemu/builds/639887646 after: https://travis-ci.org/philmd/qemu/builds/641795043Very good idea, correlating a job in the GUI to an entry in the yml file was really a pain, so far.[*] https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/customizing-the-build/#naming-jobs-within-matrices Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> --- .travis.yml | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml index 6c1038a0f1..d68e35a2c5 100644 --- a/.travis.yml +++ b/.travis.yml @@ -94,24 +94,28 @@ after_script: matrix: include: - - env: + - name: "[x86] GCC static (user)"Could you please drop the [x86] and other architectures from the names? Travis already lists the build architecture in the job status page, so this information is redundant.Hmm for me the Travis page mis-renders the architecture (on firefox) so I do find the arch in the text fairly handy.This might be a font problem, I can't see the architecture on neither Firefox nor Chrome: https://pasteboard.co/IS3O358.pngIt is the partially hidden column between the job number and the penguin (or apple if MacOS). Funny, I can see the arch on Philippe's dashboard (https://travis-ci.org/philmd/qemu) but it disappears on my own (https://travis-ci.org/wainersm/qemu).I've never had problems here, for me the column shows up correctly everywhere. It looks like this: http://people.redhat.com/~thuth/travis.png
OK now I understand better your comment :)
Anyway, most of the jobs run on x86_64. So perhaps mark only the non-x86 ones?Sounds like a good compromise to me!
I'd rather use one style, rather ARCH explicit on all, or not used at all.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |